EigoPro 1級 読解 — The Future of Work in an Automated Age

For more than two centuries, prophecies of technological unemployment have proven embarrassingly premature. Each wave of mechanisation, from the power loom to the assembly line, displaced particular occupations while engendering new ones, and economists have long invoked this historical regularity to allay anxieties about automation. Yet the complacency such precedents inspire may be misplaced. Contemporary artificial intelligence does not merely substitute for muscle, as earlier machines did; it increasingly encroaches upon cognitive territory once presumed inviolable—diagnosis, drafting, translation, even the composition of plausible prose. The pertinent question, then, is not whether work will vanish, but whether the labour market can recalibrate swiftly enough to absorb those whom the new technologies render redundant. The optimists' case rests on what economists term the productivity dividend: as automation lowers the cost of goods and services, consumers acquire surplus purchasing power, which they redirect toward novel wants, thereby spawning industries—and jobs—that no one had anticipated. This mechanism is real, but it is neither instantaneous nor evenly distributed. The displaced lorry driver does not seamlessly metamorphose into a software architect; the requisite retraining is arduous, costly, and frequently beyond the reach of those most exposed. What materialises, accordingly, is less a wholesale collapse of employment than a hollowing of its middle—a bifurcation in which lucrative, cognitively demanding roles flourish at one pole and precarious service work proliferates at the other, while the comfortable berths between them quietly evaporate. Policymakers, confronting this prospect, have floated remedies ranging from universal basic income to lifelong-learning subsidies, yet each proposal smuggles in contestable assumptions about human motivation and the meaning of labour. Work, after all, furnishes not merely income but identity, structure, and a sense of social contribution—goods that no stipend can readily replicate. The deeper challenge automation poses may therefore be less economic than existential: if machines can perform ever more of what we once considered distinctively human, the task before us is to articulate afresh what human flourishing consists in once toil is no longer its precondition. That is a question no algorithm can answer on our behalf.

5問合格 60%以上普通

新規登録 または ログイン が必要です

この単元の問題を3問、解説つきで公開しています

1級 · 読解 · 全5問

問 1

Which of the following best captures the central argument of the passage?

  • Although past mechanisation reliably created new jobs, today's AI threatens cognitive work in ways that may outpace the labour market's capacity to adapt and raise non-economic questions about human purpose.
  • Universal basic income is the only viable policy response to the mass unemployment that automation will inevitably and imminently produce.
  • The principal danger of automation lies in its tendency to lower the cost of goods, which erodes consumers' purchasing power over time.
  • History demonstrates that fears of technological unemployment are invariably unfounded, so contemporary anxieties about artificial intelligence are equally baseless.
Phrase

passage as a whole / thesis

1級読解主旨把握論旨
⚡ひとことで

過去の機械化と違い AI は認知労働に侵入し、適応速度と人間の意義を問うというのが論旨。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「Although past mechanisation reliably created new jobs, today's AI threatens cognitive work in ways that may outpace the labour market's capacity to adapt and raise non-economic questions about human purpose.」

正解

第1段落は「仕事が消えるかではなく、労働市場が十分速く recalibrate できるか」と問いを絞り、AI が認知領域 (diagnosis/drafting/translation) に侵入する点で過去と異なると述べる。最終段落では課題が「less economic than existential」だと明示している。この両者を結んだ選肢が論旨を最も忠実に要約している。

  • 「History demonstrates that fears of technological unemployment have invariably proved unfounded, and so contemporary anxieties about artificial intelligence are equally baseless.」

    = 過去が示す通り不安は常に根拠なしとする ━ 第1段落が「complacency…may be misplaced」として歴史的楽観に明示的に疑義を呈しているので本文と矛盾。

  • 「Universal basic income is the only viable policy response to the mass unemployment that automation will inevitably and imminently produce.」

    = ベーシックインカムが唯一の有効策とする ━ 第3段落は UBI を contestable assumptions を含む一案として提示するにとどまり、「唯一」とは述べていない。

  • 「The principal danger of automation lies in its tendency to lower the cost of goods, which erodes consumers' purchasing power over time.」

    = コスト低下が購買力を剥がすとする ━ 第2段落はコスト低下が surplus purchasing power を *生む* と述べており、逆の主張になっている。

▦Collocation
パターン意味例
allay anxieties不安を銭めるEconomists invoked history to allay anxieties about automation.
the pertinent question適切な問いThe pertinent question is not whether work will vanish.
recalibrate swiftly迅速に調整し直すCan the market recalibrate swiftly enough?
render redundant不要にさせる／余剰にするWorkers whom the technology renders redundant.
human flourishing人間の逆満（充実）What human flourishing consists in once toil ends.
❝例文

  • The optimists' case rests on the productivity dividend.

    楽観論者の主張は生産性の配当に依拠している。

  • AI encroaches upon cognitive territory once presumed inviolable.

    AI はかつて侵しがたいとされた認知領域に侵入する。

  • The deeper challenge may be less economic than existential.

    より深い課題は経済的というより実存的かもしれない。

  • No stipend can readily replicate identity and structure.

    いかなる手当もアイデンティティや秩序を容易に再現できない。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

C2 の主旨問は、最初と最後の段落に論旨の柱が置かれることが多い。ここでは第1段落の問い設定と最終文の「less economic than existential」が両端をなす。選肢が「単一の原因」や「唯一の解」を謳うときは、譲歩を許す本文と諸かして誤答と見抜く。

問 2

According to the passage, how does contemporary artificial intelligence differ from earlier waves of mechanisation?

  • It primarily affects highly paid cognitive workers while leaving manual and service occupations untouched.
  • It displaces occupations without generating any new ones, breaking the historical pattern of compensating job creation.
  • It intrudes into cognitive domains previously thought to be exclusively human rather than merely replacing physical labour.
  • It raises the cost of goods and services, reversing the productivity gains delivered by previous technologies.
Phrase

"does not merely substitute for muscle…it increasingly encroaches upon cognitive territory"

1級読解詳細AI と過去の違い
⚡ひとことで

筋力の代替ではなく、人間固有とされた認知領域に侵入する点が違い。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「It intrudes into cognitive domains previously thought to be exclusively human rather than merely replacing physical labour.」

正解

第1段落に「does not merely substitute for muscle, as earlier machines did; it increasingly encroaches upon cognitive territory once presumed inviolable—diagnosis, drafting, translation」と明記されている。つまり物理労働の代替ではなく認知領域に及ぶ点が決定的な違いで、この記述と正面から一致する。

  • 「It displaces occupations without generating any new ones, breaking the historical pattern of compensating job creation.」

    = 新しい仕事を一切生まないとする ━ 第2段落は生産性配当が新産業を spawning すると認めており、「一切生まない」は言い過ぎ。

  • 「It raises the cost of goods and services, reversing the productivity gains delivered by previous technologies.」

    = 財サービスのコストを上昇させるとする ━ 本文は automation がコストを lowers すると述べており逆。

  • 「It primarily affects highly paid cognitive workers while leaving manual and service occupations untouched.」

    = 認知労働者だけを脅かすとする ━ 第2段落の hollowing 論は中間層が消え両端が残る構図で、高給者のみ被害とは違う。

▦Collocation
パターン意味例
substitute for～の代替をするEarlier machines substituted for muscle.
encroach upon～に侵入するAI encroaches upon cognitive territory.
presumed inviolable侵しがたいと見なされたTerritory once presumed inviolable.
wave of mechanisation機械化の波Each wave of mechanisation displaced occupations.
plausible proseもっともらしい文章AI can compose plausible prose.
❝例文

  • The power loom displaced weavers but created other roles.

    力織機は織工を追いやったが他の役割を生んだ。

  • Diagnosis and translation are now partly automatable.

    診断や翻訳は今や一部自動化可能だ。

  • The assembly line substituted for human muscle.

    組立ラインは人間の筋力を代替した。

  • Some skills were long presumed beyond mechanisation.

    一部の技能は長らく機械化の及ばないと見なされていた。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

「どう違うか」を問う詳細問では、本文の対比マーカー (not merely X…but Y / as earlier machines did) を拾う。as earlier machines did は「過去の機械=筋力代替」を明示し、it increasingly encroaches が「今=認知」を示す。語句の対比構造を詳細の根拠にせよ。

問 3

What does the passage identify as the most likely effect of automation on the structure of employment?

  • A sudden and comprehensive collapse of employment across all sectors of the economy.
  • A polarisation in which well-paid cognitive jobs and precarious service jobs both expand while middle-tier positions disappear.
  • A proportional expansion of every category of work driven by rising consumer purchasing power.
  • A uniform upgrading of the workforce as displaced workers retrain into high-skill technical roles.
Phrase

"a hollowing of its middle—a bifurcation"

1級読解詳細雇用構造への影響
⚡ひとことで

中間層が消え、高収入認知職と不安定なサービス職に二極化すると予測。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「A polarisation in which well-paid cognitive jobs and precarious service jobs both expand while middle-tier positions disappear.」

正解

第2段落末尾に「a hollowing of its middle—a bifurcation in which lucrative, cognitively demanding roles flourish at one pole and precarious service work proliferates at the other, while the comfortable berths between them quietly evaporate」とある。両端が伸び中間が消えるという選肢がこれをそのまま言い換えている。「wholesale collapse ではない」とも明示されている。

  • 「A sudden and comprehensive collapse of employment across all sectors of the economy.」

    = 全産業で雇用が突然崩壊するとする ━ 本文は「less a wholesale collapse of employment than a hollowing of its middle」と明示し全面崩壊を否定。

  • 「A uniform upgrading of the entire workforce as displaced workers retrain into higher-skill technical roles.」

    = 全労働者が高スキル職に移るとする ━ 本文は「トラック運転手が簡単に software architect になれない」と一様高度化を否定。

  • 「A proportional expansion of every category of work driven by rising consumer purchasing power.」

    = 購買力上昇で全職種が比例拡大とする ━ 生産性配当は neither instantaneous nor evenly distributed とされ、均等な拡大は否定されている。

▦Collocation
パターン意味例
hollowing of the middle中間層の空洞化Automation causes a hollowing of the middle.
lucrative roles儲けの良い職Lucrative, cognitively demanding roles flourish.
precarious work不安定な仕事Precarious service work proliferates.
evenly distributed均等に分配されたThe dividend is not evenly distributed.
beyond the reach of～の手の届かないRetraining is beyond the reach of the most exposed.
❝例文

  • Middle

    tier clerical jobs are quietly disappearing. — 中間層の事務職は静かに消えつつある。

  • Both elite and low

    wage roles can grow simultaneously. — エリー職と低賃金職は同時に伸びうる。

  • Retraining is arduous and often unaffordable.

    再訓練は軽々しくなく負担が重い。

  • The productivity dividend arrives unevenly.

    生産性の配当は不均等に到達する。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

C2 の詳細問は「記述の程度」を計る。wholesale collapse (全面崩壊) と hollowing (中拜け) は本文が明示的に対比させており、誤答はしばしば誤った側 (全面崩壊) を拾うよう誘導する。less A than B 構文は B が筆者の立場だと見抜け。

残り2問は、解いて確かめられます

全5問すべてに、この形式の解説が付いています。 間違えた問題は記録され、あとから復習できます。

無料で登録して続きを解く

インストール不要・カード登録なし・いま全機能無料

この単元の講義を見る1級の単元一覧1級の用語集