問 1
Which statement best captures the central argument of the passage?
- Installing white roofs and reflective pavements is the most cost-effective way to eliminate the urban heat island.
- Wealthy neighbourhoods suffer the worst effects of urban heat because they contain the densest concentrations of high-rise buildings.
- Cities are unavoidably warmer than rural areas because of weather patterns that no amount of design can alter.
- The urban heat island is a designed outcome that disproportionately harms disadvantaged communities, making its remedy a matter of justice rather than mere engineering.
mitigation becomes a question of justice
都市の高温は設計の産物であり、不平等に重なるため、対策は工学ではなく公正の問題だという主張。
「The urban heat island is a designed outcome that disproportionately harms disadvantaged communities, making its remedy a matter of justice rather than mere engineering.」
正解筆者は冒頭で高温が「no meteorological accident but a predictable consequence of how we build」だと述べ、後半でそれが歴史的不平等の地図に重なると論じる。最終的に「mitigation becomes a question of justice」と結論し、技術的修正では不十分だと主張する。したがって設計の産物かつ公正の問題という二重の捉え方が中心。
「Cities are unavoidably warmer than rural areas because of weather patterns that no amount of design can alter.」
= 都市の高温は天候のせいで設計では変えられないとする説 ━ 本文は冒頭で「no meteorological accident」と明確に否定し、建て方の結果だとしているため逆。
「Installing white roofs and reflective pavements is the most cost-effective way to eliminate the urban heat island.」
= 白い屋根や反射舗装で熱島を解消できるとする説 ━ 本文は「white roofs ... might suffice」を仮定法で退け、それだけでは不十分だと論じている。
「Wealthy neighbourhoods suffer the very worst effects of urban heat because they contain the densest concentrations of tall high-rise buildings.」
= 高層ビルが集中する富裕地区が最も高温に苦しむとする説 ━ 本文は富裕地区が「leafy boulevards and pocket parks」で守られ、貧困地区こそ高温だと述べる。
| パターン | 意味 | 例 |
|---|---|---|
| a question of justice | 公正の問題 | Access to clean water has become a question of justice, not charity. |
| a consequence of | 〜の結果 | The flooding was a direct consequence of unchecked development. |
| disproportionately harm | 不均衡に害する | Pollution disproportionately harms those living near factories. |
| reframe the remedy | 対策を捉え直す | Her study reframes the remedy as prevention rather than cure. |
| mistake the symptom for the disease | 症状を病気と取り違える | Treating only the fever, they mistook the symptom for the disease. |
The heat island is not an accident but a consequence of how cities are built.
熱島は偶然ではなく都市の建て方の結果である。
Framing the issue as justice changes which solutions we pursue.
問題を公正として捉えると追求すべき解決策が変わる。
The poor endure a hotter and more lethal climate than the rich.
貧困層は富裕層より高温で致命的な気候に耐えている。
Engineering fixes alone cannot address an inequality of exposure.
工学的修正だけでは曝露の不平等に対処できない。
主旨設問では、本文が明示的に否定している命題(ここでは「気象不可避論」)が誘導肢になりやすい。冒頭の but 構文と結論の言い換えを結びつけて判断する。