EigoPro 準1級 読解 — The Attention Economy

In an economy where information is abundant, the scarce resource is no longer data but attention. Every notification, autoplaying video, and bottomless feed is engineered to capture a sliver of a finite human resource and convert it into advertising revenue. This is the premise of what commentators have come to call the "attention economy," in which the products competing for our minutes are not sold to us at all; rather, our attention is the product, packaged and sold to advertisers. The user, in this arrangement, is less a customer than a commodity. What makes the system so effective is that it exploits the very machinery of human psychology. Designers borrow techniques from the gambling industry—variable rewards, the dopamine-laden anticipation of a refresh that may or may not yield something new—so that the act of checking a phone becomes a reflex rather than a decision. Critics argue that this is not neutral engineering but a deliberate manipulation, one that erodes our capacity for sustained concentration and leaves us perpetually distracted, perpetually wanting. The cost is not merely lost productivity; it is a subtle reshaping of how we think. Yet the picture is not wholly bleak. A growing "time well spent" movement has pressed platforms to add tools that surface usage statistics, mute notifications, and nudge users toward intentional rather than compulsive engagement. Skeptics counter that such features are cosmetic—a token gesture that leaves the underlying incentives untouched, since a company whose revenue depends on engagement can hardly be expected to design wholeheartedly against it. The deeper question, then, is not whether individuals can muster the willpower to disconnect, but whether a business model built on harvesting attention can ever be reconciled with the well-being of the people it depends upon.

5問合格 60%以上普通

新規登録 または ログイン が必要です

この単元の問題を3問、解説つきで公開しています

準1級 · 読解 · 全5問

問 1

What is the main idea of the passage?

  • The scarcity of data, rather than attention, is what now drives the digital economy.
  • Digital platforms profit by capturing users' limited attention, raising doubts about whether their business model can serve users' well-being.
  • New platform tools have already solved the problem of compulsive phone use.
  • Advertisers have grown unwilling to pay technology companies for access to users' attention.
Phrase

our attention is the product, packaged and sold to advertisers

準1級読解テクノロジーメディア論説主旨把握
⚡ひとことで

本文は「注意=希少資源を奪い広告収益化する仕組み」と、その健全性への疑問が論旨。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「Digital platforms profit by capturing users' limited attention, raising doubts about whether their business model can serve users' well-being.」

正解

本文は (1) 注意こそが希少資源で『ユーザーの注意が商品』→ (2) 心理機構を突く設計でそれを成立させる→ (3) 改善策はあるが懐疑論あり、と展開し、最終文で『注意の収穫に依存するビジネスモデルが人々の幸福と両立しうるのか』と結ぶ。よって『プラットフォームは限られた注意を捉えて利益を得ており、そのモデルが利用者の幸福に資するか疑問が残る』が主旨。

  • 「Advertisers everywhere have gradually grown unwilling to pay the technology companies for any access to their users' attention.」

    = 広告主が注意への支払いを渋るようになった ━ 本文は広告主が注意を買う仕組みを前提としており、支払いを渋るという記述はない。

  • 「It is the scarcity of data, rather than the scarcity of attention, that now really drives the whole of the digital economy.」

    = データの希少性こそが経済を動かす ━ 冒頭で『希少資源はもはやデータではなく注意』と明言しており正反対。

  • 「The new tools built into the platforms have already entirely solved the whole problem of compulsive phone use among users.」

    = 新ツールが強迫的利用を既に解決した ━ 第3段でそうしたツールは『化粧的』との懐疑論を紹介しており『解決済み』は言い過ぎ。

▦Collocation
パターン意味例
the scarce resource is ~希少な資源は~だThe scarce resource is attention.
compete for ~~を奪い合うproducts competing for our minutes
convert A into BAをBに変えるconvert attention into revenue
less A than BAというよりBless a customer than a commodity
be packaged and soldパッケージ化され売られるattention packaged and sold to advertisers
❝例文

  • In this economy, attention is the scarce resource.

    この経済では注意こそが希少な資源だ。

  • These apps compete for our limited minutes.

    これらのアプリは我々の限られた時間を奪い合う。

  • The platform converts attention into advertising revenue.

    そのプラットフォームは注意を広告収益に変える。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

主旨設問は最終段の問いかけ文 (The deeper question ... is whether ~) に著者の関心が凝縮される。冒頭の定義文と最終文を結べば論旨が掴める。

問 2

According to the passage, what is the relationship of the user to the attention economy?

  • The user is the paying customer for whom the platforms are designed.
  • The user is an employee whose productivity the platforms seek to maximize.
  • The user purchases attention from advertisers in exchange for free content.
  • The user's attention is the product that platforms package and sell to advertisers.
Phrase

our attention is the product ... The user ... is less a customer than a commodity

準1級読解テクノロジーメディア論説詳細把握
⚡ひとことで

ユーザーは顧客ではなく『商品』であり、その注意が広告主に売られる。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「The user's attention is the product that platforms package and sell to advertisers.」

正解

第1段は『製品は我々に売られているのではなく、我々の注意こそが商品で、広告主にパッケージ化され売られる』と述べ、続けて『ユーザーは顧客というより商品 (commodity) だ』と結ぶ。これを言い換えた『ユーザーの注意が、広告主に売られる商品である』が正解。

  • 「The user is the paying customer for whom the platforms are designed.」

    = ユーザーは設計対象の有料顧客だ ━ 本文は『顧客というより商品』と明言しており、対価を払う顧客ではない。

  • 「The user purchases attention from advertisers in exchange for free content.」

    = ユーザーが広告主から注意を買う ━ 注意を売買するのは広告主とプラットフォームであり、方向が逆。

  • 「The user is an employee whose productivity the platforms seek to maximize.」

    = ユーザーは生産性を最大化される従業員だ ━ 本文は失われる生産性に触れるが、ユーザーを従業員とは位置づけていない。

▦Collocation
パターン意味例
be sold to ~~に売られるOur attention is sold to advertisers.
less A than BAというよりBless a customer than a commodity
in this arrangementこの仕組みではIn this arrangement, the user is the product.
compete for our minutes我々の時間を奪い合うproducts competing for our minutes
advertising revenue広告収益convert attention into advertising revenue
❝例文

  • If the service is free, you are the product.

    サービスが無料なら、あなたが商品だ。

  • Your attention is sold to advertisers.

    あなたの注意は広告主に売られる。

  • He is less a friend than a business contact.

    彼は友人というより仕事上の知人だ。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

detail 設問は本文の比喩 (commodity / product) を平易な節に言い換えた選択肢が正解。『less A than B』は『AではなくむしろB』と読む。

問 3

According to the passage, why do skeptics doubt the effectiveness of "time well spent" features?

  • The features have been shown to increase compulsive use rather than reduce it.
  • Such tools eliminate advertising revenue entirely, so companies abandon them.
  • A company whose revenue depends on engagement is unlikely to design seriously against it, leaving the underlying incentives intact.
  • Users are legally barred from turning off notifications on most platforms.
Phrase

a company whose revenue depends on engagement can hardly be expected to design wholeheartedly against it

準1級読解テクノロジーメディア論説詳細把握
⚡ひとことで

収益がエンゲージメント依存の企業が本気でそれに逆らう設計をするはずがない=改善は表面的。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「A company whose revenue depends on engagement is unlikely to design seriously against it, leaving the underlying incentives intact.」

正解

第3段で懐疑論者は『時間有効活用』機能を cosmetic (化粧的)・token gesture (申し訳程度の身振り) と評し、『収益がエンゲージメントに依存する企業が本気でそれに逆らう設計をするとは期待しがたい』と論じる。よって『収益がエンゲージメント依存の企業は本気で逆らう設計をしそうになく、根底の誘因はそのまま残る』が正解。

  • 「These features have in fact been shown only to increase the compulsive use of the phone rather than to reduce it.」

    = 機能が強迫的利用を増やすと示された ━ 本文は機能が無効=表面的と言うだけで『利用を増やす』証拠は述べていない。

  • 「Users everywhere are legally barred from ever turning off any of the notifications on most of these platforms.」

    = 通知オフが法的に禁じられている ━ むしろ機能は通知を消せると述べており、法的禁止の記述はない。

  • 「Such tools eliminate all of the advertising revenue entirely, so the companies quickly abandon them once again.」

    = ツールが広告収益を完全に消すので企業が放棄する ━ 本文は収益が温存される (incentives untouched) と述べており正反対。

▦Collocation
パターン意味例
depend on ~~に依存するrevenue depends on engagement
can hardly be expected to V~するとは到底期待できないcan hardly be expected to design against it
leave A untouchedAを手つかずのまま残すleave the incentives untouched
a token gesture申し訳程度の身振りmerely a token gesture
design against ~~に逆らう設計をするdesign against engagement
❝例文

  • Their revenue depends on how long you stay online.

    彼らの収益は滞在時間に依存する。

  • He can hardly be expected to act against his own interest.

    彼が自らの利益に反して行動するとは到底期待できない。

  • The reform left the core incentives untouched.

    その改革は中核の誘因を手つかずのまま残した。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

詳細設問は懐疑論の根拠 (利益相反) を述べる because/since 節を探す。本文の cosmetic / untouched を seriously / intact に置換した肢が正解。

残り2問は、解いて確かめられます

全5問すべてに、この形式の解説が付いています。 間違えた問題は記録され、あとから復習できます。

無料で登録して続きを解く

インストール不要・カード登録なし・いま全機能無料

この単元の講義を見る準1級の単元一覧準1級の用語集