EigoPro 準1級 読解 — Coffeehouses and the Public Sphere

When historians search for the birthplace of modern public opinion, they keep returning to an unlikely setting: the crowded, smoke-filled coffeehouse of eighteenth-century London. For the price of a single penny—the cost of admission and a dish of coffee—a man could enter, sit at a long communal table, and join a conversation already in progress. These establishments, numbering in the thousands at their peak, became known as "penny universities," because the talk on offer was often worth more than the brew. What made them remarkable was not the coffee but the conventions that governed them. Inside, the ordinary hierarchies of rank were, at least nominally, suspended. A merchant might argue politics with a lord; a clerk might dispute a point of science with a physician. Newspapers and pamphlets lay scattered on the tables, and patrons read them aloud, debated their claims, and circulated rumours and stock prices alike. Particular houses acquired particular characters: one became the haunt of poets, another of marine insurers, a third of natural philosophers. In effect, the coffeehouse functioned as a clearing-house for information at a moment when no other institution performed that role. The political authorities were not amused. In 1675, Charles II attempted to suppress the coffeehouses outright, denouncing them as nurseries of sedition where idle men spread "false, malicious and scandalous reports." The proclamation provoked such an outcry that it was withdrawn within days—a small but telling episode. It revealed that a space for unsupervised public discussion had already become something the Crown could no longer simply abolish. Historians caution against romanticising these rooms. Women were largely excluded, and the "equality" of the table never extended very far beyond the literate, propertied few. Yet the coffeehouse nonetheless rehearsed a genuinely new idea: that private individuals, gathering voluntarily, could form collective judgements on matters of common concern—and that those judgements might count. The habit, once acquired, proved impossible to unlearn.

5問合格 60%以上普通

新規登録 または ログイン が必要です

この単元の問題を3問、解説つきで公開しています

準1級 · 読解 · 全5

1

What is the main idea of the passage?

  • The popularity of coffeehouses was driven mainly by the quality of the coffee they served.
  • Charles II succeeded in permanently closing London's coffeehouses in 1675.
  • Eighteenth-century coffeehouses fostered a new culture of open public debate that helped shape modern public opinion.
  • Coffeehouses offered complete social equality to everyone who entered them.
Phrase: the coffeehouse nonetheless rehearsed a genuinely new idea

that private individuals ... could form collective judgements

準1級読解社会史主旨把握
ひとことで

本文全体は「18世紀のコーヒーハウスが開かれた公共討論を育み、近代の世論形成に寄与した」という論旨。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

Eighteenth-century coffeehouses fostered a new culture of open public debate that helped shape modern public opinion.

正解

冒頭で『近代の世論の発祥地』を探すと歴史家はコーヒーハウスに戻ると述べ、本文は (1) 安価で誰でも参加できる議論の場→ (2) 身分を超えた討論と情報交換→ (3) 当局による弾圧の失敗→ (4) 自発的な個人が共通の関心事で集合的判断を形成する『新しい思想の予行演習』という結論へ進む。よって『開かれた公共討論の文化を育み近代の世論形成に寄与した』が主旨。

  • The popularity of the coffeehouses was driven mainly by the quality of the coffee that they served.

    = 人気は主にコーヒーの質によるもの ━ 本文は『コーヒーではなく会話が価値だった (the talk ... worth more than the brew / not the coffee but the conventions)』と明言しており逆。

  • Charles the Second succeeded in permanently closing every one of London's coffeehouses in the year 1675.

    = チャールズ2世が恒久的に閉鎖に成功した ━ 弾圧の布告は数日で撤回された (withdrawn within days) と本文に明記、失敗している。

  • The coffeehouses offered a complete social equality to each and every person who ever entered them.

    = 誰にでも完全な社会的平等を提供した ━ 最終段で女性は排除され平等は読み書きできる有産層に限られたと明言、言い過ぎ。

Collocation
パターン意味
the birthplace of ~~の発祥地the birthplace of public opinion
a conversation already in progressすでに進行中の会話join a conversation already in progress
function as a clearing-house for ~~の集約拠点として機能するfunction as a clearing-house for information
form collective judgements集合的判断を形成するindividuals could form collective judgements
matters of common concern共通の関心事judgements on matters of common concern
例文
  • The coffeehouse functioned as a clearing

    house for news and rumour. — そのコーヒーハウスは情報と噂の集約拠点として機能した。

  • Historians keep returning to this unlikely setting.

    歴史家は何度もこの意外な舞台に立ち戻る。

  • Private individuals gathered voluntarily to debate common concerns.

    私人たちが自発的に集まり共通の関心事を議論した。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

主旨設問は冒頭の問題提起 (birthplace of public opinion) と最終段の結論 (a genuinely new idea) を結ぶ。極端な肯定肢 (complete equality / everyone) は本文の留保 (largely excluded) と矛盾しやすい。

2

According to the passage, why were coffeehouses called "penny universities"?

  • They were officially licensed by universities to teach the public.
  • A penny bought entry to conversation that was often more valuable than the coffee itself.
  • A penny was the standard fee for borrowing the newspapers on the tables.
  • They charged students a penny to attend formal lectures.
Phrase

became known as "penny universities," because the talk on offer was often worth more than the brew

準1級読解社会史詳細把握
ひとことで

1ペニーで入場でき、提供される会話がコーヒー以上の価値を持ったため『ペニー大学』と呼ばれた。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

A penny bought entry to conversation that was often more valuable than the coffee itself.

正解

第1段で『1ペニー (入場料とコーヒー1杯の代金) で男は入って会話に加われた』と述べ、『talk on offer was often worth more than the brew (提供される会話はしばしばコーヒーより価値があった)』ゆえ penny universities と呼ばれたと明示する。これを言い換えた『1ペニーがコーヒー以上に価値ある会話への入場を買った』が正解。

  • They charged all of their students a penny in order to attend the formal lectures.

    = 学生に正式な講義料として1ペニー徴収した ━ 学生も正式な講義も本文にない。誰でも入れる議論の場だった。

  • They were officially licensed by the universities to teach members of the public.

    = 大学に公式に認可されていた ━ 大学による認可の記述はなく、比喩的な呼称にすぎない。

  • A penny was the standard fee charged for borrowing the newspapers on the tables.

    = 新聞を借りる標準料金 ━ 新聞はテーブルに散らばり読み上げられたが、借用料という記述はない。

Collocation
パターン意味
for the price of ~~の代金でfor the price of a single penny
become known as ~~として知られるようになるbecame known as penny universities
the talk on offer提供される会話the talk on offer was valuable
worth more than ~~より価値があるworth more than the brew
a dish of coffeeコーヒー1杯a penny and a dish of coffee
例文
  • For the price of a penny, anyone could join the debate.

    1ペニーの代金で誰でも討論に加われた。

  • The club became known as a meeting place for poets.

    そのクラブは詩人たちの集いの場として知られるようになった。

  • The advice on offer was worth more than the fee.

    提供される助言は料金以上の価値があった。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

原因設問は本文の『because ...』節を直接探すのが速い。誤答は『学生・大学・借用料』など本文にない具体名詞を足してくる典型パターン。

3

What does the passage say about Charles II's 1675 proclamation against the coffeehouses?

  • It was welcomed by the merchants and lords who frequented the houses.
  • It met with such opposition that it was abandoned within days.
  • It successfully reduced the number of coffeehouses for several years.
  • It was never actually issued because the king feared public anger.
Phrase

The proclamation provoked such an outcry that it was withdrawn within days

準1級読解社会史詳細把握
ひとことで

1675年の弾圧布告は猛烈な抗議を招き、数日で撤回された。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

It met with such opposition that it was abandoned within days.

正解

第3段でチャールズ2世が1675年にコーヒーハウスを『扇動の温床』として全面禁圧しようとしたが、『布告は猛烈な抗議 (such an outcry) を招き数日で撤回された (withdrawn within days)』と述べる。これを言い換えた『あまりの反対に数日で撤回された』が正解。

  • It successfully reduced the number of coffeehouses for several years.

    = 数年間コーヒーハウスの数を減らした ━ 数日で撤回されたので数を減らす効果はなかった。

  • welcomed by the merchants and lords

    = 商人や貴族に歓迎された ━ 歓迎ではなく抗議 (outcry) を招いた。常連が歓迎するはずもない。

  • never actually issued

    = 実際には発令されなかった ━ 発令された (attempted to suppress / The proclamation) からこそ撤回された。事実誤認。

Collocation
パターン意味
attempt to suppress ~~を弾圧しようとするattempted to suppress the coffeehouses
denounce A as BAをBと非難するdenouncing them as nurseries of sedition
provoke an outcry抗議を招くprovoked such an outcry
be withdrawn within days数日で撤回されるwithdrawn within days
a small but telling episode小さいが示唆に富む出来事a small but telling episode
例文
  • The ban provoked such an outcry that it was withdrawn at once.

    その禁令はあまりの抗議を招きすぐに撤回された。

  • The king denounced the meetings as nurseries of sedition.

    国王はその集会を扇動の温床と非難した。

  • It was a small but telling episode in the dispute.

    それはその争いの中の小さいが示唆に富む出来事だった。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

detail 設問で『成功/失敗』を問う型は、結果を述べる動詞 (withdrawn / abandoned) を本文で確認する。誤答は結果を正反対 (succeeded) に、または前提を否定 (never issued) に歪めてくる。

残り2問は、解いて確かめられます

5問すべてに、この形式の解説が付いています。 間違えた問題は記録され、あとから復習できます。

無料で登録して続きを解く

インストール不要・カード登録なし・いま全機能無料