問 1
What is the main idea of the passage?
- Bilingual children inevitably fall behind monolingual children in mastering either language.
- Neuroscience has now conclusively proven that bilingualism prevents dementia.
- Far from harming the mind, managing two languages appears to strengthen the brain's control systems and may protect it over a lifetime.
- Educators were right to warn that two languages confuse a developing child.
juggling two languages does not muddle the brain so much as exercise it
本文全体は「二言語の運用は脳を混乱させるどころか鍛え、生涯にわたり守りうる」という論旨。
「Far from harming the mind, managing two languages appears to strengthen the brain's control systems and may protect it over a lifetime.」
正解本文は (1) かつての『二言語は子供を混乱させる』通念が覆った→ (2) 二言語の抑制が executive control を鍛える仕組み→ (3) 生涯にわたる cognitive reserve の可能性 (ただし慎重論あり) という構成。最終段の a second language is not a burden ... but a habit that may quietly fortify it が結論。よって「害するどころか脳の制御系を強化し、生涯にわたり守りうる」が主旨。
「Bilingual children everywhere inevitably fall behind the monolingual children in mastering either of their languages.」
= 二言語児は必ず遅れる ━ 本文冒頭はこの旧通念を『今や覆った (overturned)』と否定しているので逆。
「Modern neuroscience has by now conclusively proven that bilingualism entirely prevents the later onset of dementia.」
= 認知症予防が決定的に証明された ━ 本文は早期の知見が『再現困難 (difficult to reproduce)』で慎重論ありと明言しており conclusively ではない。
「The educators of the past were quite right to warn that learning two languages will confuse any developing child.」
= 教育者の警告は正しかった ━ 本文は教育者の警告を『folk wisdom が覆った』と退けているので正反対。
| パターン | 意味 | 例 |
|---|---|---|
| be viewed with suspicion | 疑いの目で見られる | Bilingualism was viewed with suspicion. |
| be overturned | 覆される | That folk wisdom has been overturned. |
| a growing body of ~ | 増えつつある~ | a growing body of neuroscience |
| leave an imprint on ~ | ~に痕跡を残す | It leaves an imprint on thought. |
| not A so much as B | AというよりむしろB | not muddle so much as exercise |
A growing body of evidence supports the claim.
それを支持する証拠が増えつつある。
The old folk wisdom has been overturned.
その古い通念は覆された。
Stress does not weaken him so much as motivate him.
ストレスは彼を弱めるというよりむしろ奮い立たせる。
主旨設問は最終段の対比結論文 (not A but B) を探すと速い。冒頭の旧通念は『覆された』ものとして提示される導入装置で、主旨ではない。