EigoPro 1級 読解 — The Self as a Story We Cannot Stop Telling

We are, it seems, incorrigibly autobiographical creatures. From the fragments of memory, regret, and aspiration that flicker through consciousness, we fashion a single protagonist and grant it a name: the self. Proponents of the narrative view hold that selfhood is not a substance we possess but a story we relentlessly compose, editing the past so that it appears to lead, with a semblance of inevitability, to the person now doing the telling. On this account, coherence is not found; it is conferred. The thesis is seductive precisely because it explains so much. It accounts for why we recast our blunders as formative lessons, why we forgive in our younger selves what we would condemn in a stranger, and why a life that resists narration—scattered, episodic, devoid of arc—strikes us as somehow impoverished. Yet seduction is no proof. Critics retort that the narrative impulse, far from disclosing who we are, systematically distorts it. The storyteller is an unreliable editor, smoothing contingency into destiny and conscripting accidents into the service of a theme that was never there. What feels like self-knowledge may be little more than flattering revision, a plot imposed retroactively on events that obeyed no plot at all. Here the dispute sharpens into a genuine fork. If the unity of a self is merely a fiction we find consoling, then its therapeutic value—the comfort of feeling whole—cannot vouch for its truth; a useful illusion remains an illusion. But the defender may turn this objection on its head. Perhaps there exists no deeper fact about personal identity that the story either matches or betrays; perhaps to be a continuous self just is to sustain a livable narrative. On this radical reading, the question of whether coherence is discovered or invented dissolves, for there is nothing antecedent to the act of telling against which it could be measured; the telling does not report the self—it constitutes it. The story, in short, is not a window onto the protagonist. It is the only protagonist there is.

5問合格 60%以上普通

新規登録 または ログイン が必要です

この単元の問題を3問、解説つきで公開しています

1級 · 読解 · 全5問

問 1

Which statement best captures the central argument of the passage?

  • The narrative view treats the self as something composed through storytelling rather than discovered, and the passage ultimately suggests this telling may constitute rather than merely describe the self.
  • The passage proves that the unified self is a comforting illusion with no value, since useful fictions are still false.
  • The passage concludes that a scattered, episodic life is morally superior to one organized around a coherent story.
  • The passage argues that autobiographical memory is reliable and accurately preserves the events that shaped us.
Phrase

the telling does not report the self—it constitutes it

1級読解主旨把握論旨
⚡ひとことで

自己は発見されるのではなく物語によって構成されるという見方を提示し、最終的に「語りが自己を作る」可能性まで踏み込む。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「The narrative view treats the self as something composed through storytelling rather than discovered, and the passage ultimately suggests this telling may constitute rather than merely describe the self.」

正解

本文は冒頭で「coherence is not found; it is conferred」と物語的自己観を導入し、賛否を経て最後に「the telling does not report the self—it constitutes it」と結ぶ。つまり自己は語りによって構成されうるという最も急進的な読みに到達する。これが論旨の核心である。

  • 「The passage proves that the unified self is merely a comforting illusion with no value at all, since a useful fiction remains false no matter how consoling it may happen to be.」

    = 統一的自己は無価値な幻想だと証明したとする ━ 本文は批判を紹介するが「defender may turn this objection on its head」と反論も提示し、断定はしていない。

  • 「The passage argues that autobiographical memory is reliable and accurately preserves the events that shaped us.」

    = 自伝的記憶は正確で信頼できると主張するとする ━ 本文はむしろ「The storyteller is an unreliable editor」と記憶の歪曲を指摘しており逆である。

  • 「The passage concludes that a scattered, episodic life is morally superior to one organized around a coherent story.」

    = 断片的な人生の方が道徳的に優れていると結論づけるとする ━ 本文は断片的な生を「impoverished」と感じると述べるだけで、優越性は主張していない。

▦Collocation
パターン意味例
compose a story物語を構成するWe compose a story that makes our choices seem inevitable.
confer coherence一貫性を付与するNarration confers coherence on a disordered past.
resist narration物語化に抵抗するSome lives resist narration because they lack a clear arc.
turn an objection on its head反論を逆手に取るThe defender turns the objection on its head.
constitute the self自己を構成するOn this view, telling does not report but constitutes the self.
❝例文

  • The protagonist of my story is, inconveniently, also its author.

    私の物語の主人公は、不都合にもその作者でもある。

  • Coherence here is conferred, not found.

    ここで一貫性は発見されるのではなく付与される。

  • A life without an arc feels impoverished to us.

    筋のない人生は私たちには貧しく感じられる。

  • The story may be the only protagonist there is.

    物語こそが唯一の主人公なのかもしれない。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

主旨設問では結論段落の最後の一文に注目。本文は「constitutes it」「the only protagonist there is」で構成説に着地している。

問 2

According to the passage, why do critics object to the narrative view?

  • Because the narrative view denies that memory and aspiration play any role in the self.
  • Because storytelling makes people remember their failures too vividly and painfully.
  • Because the narrative impulse distorts who we are by smoothing chance events into a destiny and forcing accidents to serve a theme that was never present.
  • Because narratives are too difficult for most people to construct without professional help.
Phrase

smoothing contingency into destiny

1級読解詳細把握
⚡ひとことで

批判者は物語衝動が自己を歪めると言う。偶然を運命に均し、事故を存在しないテーマに奉仕させるからだ。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「Because the narrative impulse distorts who we are by smoothing chance events into a destiny and forcing accidents to serve a theme that was never present.」

正解

第2段落で批判者は「the narrative impulse, far from disclosing who we are, systematically distorts it」と述べる。その理由として「smoothing contingency into destiny and conscripting accidents into the service of a theme that was never there」が挙げられる。偶然を運命に変える歪曲が反対の根拠である。

  • 「Because narratives are far too difficult for most ordinary people to construct without the professional help of one kind or another.」

    = 物語構成は難しく専門的助けが要るとする ━ 本文は構成の難易度には一切触れていない。

  • 「Because storytelling makes people remember their failures too vividly and painfully.」

    = 失敗を鮮明に苦しく思い出させるからとする ━ 本文ではむしろ失敗を「formative lessons」に作り替えると述べており逆の作用。

  • 「Because the narrative view denies that memory and aspiration play any role in the self.」

    = 記憶や願望の役割を否定するからとする ━ 本文冒頭は記憶・後悔・願望から自己を編むとしており、否定はしていない。

▦Collocation
パターン意味例
distort the truth真実を歪めるThe impulse may distort the truth about who we are.
smooth A into BAをBへと均すIt smooths contingency into destiny.
conscript into the service of〜に奉仕させる徴用するAccidents are conscripted into the service of a theme.
far from doing〜どころかFar from disclosing the self, it distorts it.
disclose who we are私たちが何者かを明かすNarration may fail to disclose who we are.
❝例文

  • Chance is quietly smoothed into destiny.

    偶然は静かに運命へと均される。

  • He conscripted random events into a tidy theme.

    彼は無作為な出来事を整然としたテーマに徴用した。

  • An unreliable editor revises the past.

    不誠実な編集者が過去を改訂する。

  • The theme was never really there.

    そのテーマは初めから存在しなかった。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

detail設問は本文の該当文を逐語的に確認。「contingency(偶然) → destiny(運命)」という変換が批判の鍵語。

問 3

What does the passage identify as a problem with the therapeutic value of feeling whole?

  • The comfort of feeling whole is so strong that it permanently prevents people from seeing the truth.
  • Even if believing in a unified self brings comfort, that comfort cannot guarantee the belief is true, because a useful illusion is still an illusion.
  • Therapy that relies on storytelling has been shown to harm patients over time.
  • Feeling whole is valuable enough that its truth no longer matters to philosophers.
Phrase

a useful illusion remains an illusion

1級読解詳細把握
⚡ひとことで

全体感の慰めは真理の保証にはならない。役立つ幻想も依然として幻想だから。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「Even if believing in a unified self brings comfort, that comfort cannot guarantee the belief is true, because a useful illusion is still an illusion.」

正解

第3段落は「its therapeutic value—the comfort of feeling whole—cannot vouch for its truth」と述べ、続けて「a useful illusion remains an illusion」と結ぶ。慰めという効用があっても、それが真実性を担保するわけではないという指摘が問題点である。

  • 「Therapy that relies on storytelling has been shown to harm patients over time.」

    = 物語的療法が患者を害すると示されたとする ━ 本文に療法の害に関する記述はない。

  • 「The comfort of feeling whole is so strong that it permanently prevents people from ever seeing the truth about themselves at all.」

    = 慰めが強すぎて真実を永久に見えなくするとする ━ 本文は真実保証の欠如を言うだけで「永久に見えない」とは述べていない。

  • 「Feeling whole is valuable enough that its truth no longer matters to philosophers.」

    = 全体感は価値があり真実性はもう問題でないとする ━ これは批判側ではなく後段の擁護側の急進的読みであり、ここでの「問題」とは別。

▦Collocation
パターン意味例
vouch for〜を保証するComfort cannot vouch for truth.
therapeutic value治療的価値Its therapeutic value is undeniable.
feel whole全体性を感じるThe story lets us feel whole.
useful illusion有用な幻想A useful illusion is still an illusion.
turn an objection on its head反論を逆手に取るThe defender turns this objection on its head.
❝例文

  • Comfort is not a credential for truth.

    慰めは真実の資格証ではない。

  • The illusion was useful but false.

    その幻想は有用だが偽だった。

  • Nothing here vouches for its accuracy.

    ここには正確さを保証するものは何もない。

  • Feeling whole soothed her doubts.

    全体感は彼女の疑念を和らげた。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

「effects(効用)」と「truth(真理)」を区別する論法。慰め=真実ではない、という分離が問われる典型。

残り2問は、解いて確かめられます

全5問すべてに、この形式の解説が付いています。 間違えた問題は記録され、あとから復習できます。

無料で登録して続きを解く

インストール不要・カード登録なし・いま全機能無料

この単元の講義を見る1級の単元一覧1級の用語集