EigoPro 1級 読解 — The Fiction We Call Remembering

We are inclined to imagine memory as a faithful archive, a repository from which the past is retrieved intact, like a recording replayed on demand. This metaphor is not merely imprecise; it is profoundly misleading. Recollection is not playback but reconstruction—an act of creative reassembly in which fragments of sensory residue, inference, expectation, and prior knowledge are stitched together anew each time we remember. The brain does not store experiences as discrete files; it preserves scattered traces and, when summoned, fabricates a plausible whole from them, papering over gaps with whatever seems probable. Crucially, this fabrication is reconstituted afresh on every occasion, which means each act of recall subtly rewrites the very memory it purports to recover. To revisit a recollection is therefore to revise it. This has unsettling implications, nowhere more acute than in the courtroom. Eyewitness testimony enjoys an authority disproportionate to its reliability, for jurors instinctively equate vividness and confidence with accuracy. Yet vividness is a property of the act of remembering, not a guarantee of fidelity to events; a wholly fictitious recollection can feel just as luminous as a true one. A witness's account is exquisitely malleable: a leading question, a suggestive photograph, even the mere passage of time can quietly insinuate detail that the brain then incorporates as authentic, sealing it seamlessly into the original scene. The witness is not lying; she is sincerely reporting a memory that has been contaminated without her awareness, and her very sincerity renders the distortion invisible to judge and jury alike. The danger, then, is not that memory occasionally errs but that its errors are systematic, confident, and indistinguishable from truth to the one who holds them. To treat recollection as evidence is to mistake a continually edited draft for an original document. None of this counsels despair; memory remains broadly serviceable for the ordinary business of living, and we could scarcely function without it. But it demands that institutions which stake liberty on remembered detail abandon the comforting fiction of the mind as a camera, and reckon instead with the inconvenient truth that to remember is, inescapably, to invent.

5問合格 60%以上普通

新規登録 または ログイン が必要です

この単元の問題を3問、解説つきで公開しています

1級 · 読解 · 全5問

問 1

Which statement best captures the central argument of the passage?

  • Because remembering is an act of reconstruction rather than replay, memories are routinely altered, which undermines the trust placed in eyewitness testimony.
  • Eyewitnesses who give confident testimony are usually being deliberately deceptive about what they saw.
  • The brain stores experiences as complete recordings that can be faithfully retrieved when needed.
  • Memory is so unreliable that it should be regarded as useless for the ordinary purposes of daily life.
Phrase

Recollection is not playback but reconstruction

1級読解主旨把握論旨
⚡ひとことで

記憶は再生ではなく再構成であり、それが目撃証言を危うくするというのが主旨。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「Because remembering is an act of reconstruction rather than replay, memories are routinely altered, which undermines the trust placed in eyewitness testimony.」

正解

筆者は冒頭で「Recollection is not playback but reconstruction」と述べ、記憶が想起のたびに再構成・書き換えられると論じる。この性質が「nowhere more acute than in the courtroom」として目撃証言の信頼性を損なうと結論づけている。よって「再構成→記憶の改変→証言への不信」が中心論旨である。

  • 「Memory is so unreliable that it should be regarded as useless for the ordinary purposes of daily life.」

    = 記憶は無用だから日常生活でも頼れない ━ 本文は「memory remains broadly serviceable for the ordinary business of living」と明記し、日常の実用性は認めているため言い過ぎ。。

  • 「Eyewitnesses who give confident testimony are usually being quite deliberately deceptive about what they actually saw at the scene of the crime.」

    = 自信ある目撃者は通常意図的に嘘をついている ━ 本文は「The witness is not lying; she is sincerely reporting」と述べ、虚偽ではなく無自覚の汚染だとしているため逆。。

  • 「The brain stores experiences as complete recordings that can be faithfully retrieved when needed.」

    = 脳は体験を完全な録画として保存し忠実に取り出せる ━ 本文は「The brain does not store experiences as discrete files」としてこの見方を明示的に否定しているため誤り。。

▦Collocation
パターン意味例
an act of creative reassembly創造的な再構成の行為Remembering is best described as an act of creative reassembly.
disproportionate to its reliability信頼性に見合わない（権威）Its prestige is disproportionate to its reliability.
equate confidence with accuracy自信を正確さと同一視するJurors tend to equate confidence with accuracy.
incorporate as authentic本物として取り込むThe brain may incorporate a suggested detail as authentic.
stake liberty on（人の）自由を賭けるCourts stake liberty on remembered detail.
❝例文

  • To remember is, in this view, to invent.

    この見方では、思い出すとは発明することだ。

  • Each act of recall subtly rewrites the memory itself.

    想起のたびに記憶そのものが微妙に書き換えられる。

  • Vividness is no guarantee of fidelity to events.

    鮮明さは出来事への忠実さの保証にはならない。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

主旨問題は「やりすぎ」の選択肢を選ぶと誤る。本文は記憶を全否定せず（「broadly serviceable」）、偏りの性質を論じている。極端な言い換えはトラップ。

問 2

According to the passage, how does the brain produce a recollection when a memory is summoned?

  • It compares several stored recordings and selects the most vivid one.
  • It locates the relevant discrete file and replays its contents intact.
  • It retrieves a sealed copy that remains unchanged by the act of recall.
  • It fabricates a plausible whole from scattered traces it has preserved.
Phrase

fabricates a plausible whole

1級読解詳細把握
⚡ひとことで

脳は散在した痕跡からもっともらしい全体像を作り上げる。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「It fabricates a plausible whole from scattered traces it has preserved.」

正解

本文は「it preserves scattered traces and, when summoned, fabricates a plausible whole from them」と明示する。つまり保存されているのは断片的な痕跡であり、想起時にそれらから全体像を作り上げる。よってこの選択肢が本文の記述と一致する。

  • 「It locates the relevant discrete file and replays its contents intact.」

    = 該当する個別ファイルを見つけそのまま再生する ━ 本文は「The brain does not store experiences as discrete files」と述べ、ファイル再生を明示的に否定している。。

  • 「It compares several stored recordings and selects the most vivid one.」

    = 複数の保存録画を比較し最も鮮明なものを選ぶ ━ 鮮明さは「a property of the act of remembering」とされるが、複数録画から選ぶという記述は本文にない。。

  • 「It retrieves a sealed copy that remains unchanged by the act of recall.」

    = 想起によって変わらない密封された複製を取り出す ━ 本文は想起のたびに記憶が「rewrites」されると述べるため、不変という点が誤り。。

▦Collocation
パターン意味例
scattered traces散在した痕跡Only scattered traces of the event survive.
fabricate a plausible wholeもっともらしい全体を作り上げるThe mind fabricates a plausible whole on demand.
preserve scattered traces断片的な痕跡を保存するThe brain preserves scattered traces, not files.
stitch together anew改めて縫い合わせるFragments are stitched together anew each time.
when summoned呼び出されたときWhen summoned, the brain assembles a memory.
❝例文

  • The recollection is assembled from fragments, not files.

    その想起はファイルではなく断片から組み立てられる。

  • The whole is fabricated, then felt as real.

    全体像は作り上げられ、その後本物として感じられる。

  • Plausibility, not accuracy, guides the reassembly.

    再構成を導くのは正確さではなくもっともらしさだ。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

「fabricate」はここでは「虚偽」ではなく「無から構築する」意。detail 設問は本文の語句をそのまま拾う選択肢が正解になりやすい。

問 3

Why, according to the passage, does a contaminated memory often escape detection by the witness herself?

  • Her sincere belief in the memory makes the distortion invisible to her.
  • She is aware of the suggestion but chooses to repeat it anyway.
  • She deliberately conceals the parts she knows to be inaccurate.
  • She doubts the memory so strongly that she reports it with hesitation.
Phrase

her very sincerity renders the distortion invisible

1級読解詳細把握
⚡ひとことで

証人の誠実さそのものが歪みを見えなくする。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「Her sincere belief in the memory makes the distortion invisible to her.」

正解

本文は「her very sincerity renders the distortion invisible」と述べる。証人は「not lying」で「sincerely reporting a memory that has been contaminated without her awareness」なため、本人には歪みが見えない。よって誠実な信念が検出を妨げるという選択肢が正しい。

  • 「She deliberately conceals the parts she knows to be inaccurate.」

    = 誤りと知る部分を意図的に隠す ━ 本文は証人が「not lying」であるとし、隠蔽の意図を否定しているため誤り。。

  • 「She is aware of the suggestion but chooses to repeat it anyway.」

    = 示唆を自覚しつつあえて繰り返す ━ 汚染は「without her awareness」とされるため、自覚しているとするのは本文と矛盾する。。

  • 「She doubts the memory so strongly that she reports it with hesitation.」

    = 記憶を強く疑いためらいながら報告する ━ 本文は証言が「vividness and confidence」を伴うとしており、躊躇とは反対の記述だから誤り。。

▦Collocation
パターン意味例
render ... invisible〜を見えなくするSincerity can render distortion invisible.
without her awareness本人の無自覚のうちにThe detail was added without her awareness.
insinuate detailさりげなく細部を忍び込ませるA leading question can insinuate detail.
sincerely report誠実に報告するShe sincerely reports what she now recalls.
contaminated memory汚染された記憶A contaminated memory can feel entirely authentic.
❝例文

  • Her sincerity, not deceit, is what hides the error.

    誤りを隠すのは欺きではなく誠実さだ。

  • A suggestion can slip into memory unnoticed.

    示唆は気づかれず記憶に入り込むことがある。

  • She believes the false detail as firmly as the true ones.

    彼女は偽の細部を真実と同じく固く信じている。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

「very + 名詞」は「まさにその〜そのもの」と強調する用法。「her very sincerity」＝「その誠実さこそが」。因果を問う設問では「without her awareness」の無自覚性が鍵。

残り2問は、解いて確かめられます

全5問すべてに、この形式の解説が付いています。 間違えた問題は記録され、あとから復習できます。

無料で登録して続きを解く

インストール不要・カード登録なし・いま全機能無料

この単元の講義を見る1級の単元一覧1級の用語集