問 1
What is the main idea of the passage?
- Microplastics have been proven to cause severe and immediate harm to the human body.
- Floating islands of plastic debris are the most urgent environmental threat facing the oceans.
- Microplastics have spread pervasively and entered the food chain, and while they cannot be removed, their further growth can be curbed.
- Banning microbeads in cosmetics has already solved most of the microplastic problem.
The realistic goal is not to undo the contamination but to stop making it worse
本文は「微小プラスチックが遍在し食物連鎖に入ったが、除去は不可能でも悪化は止められる」という論旨。
「Microplastics have spread pervasively and entered the food chain, and while they cannot be removed, their further growth can be curbed.」
正解本文は (1) 微小プラスチックがあらゆる場所で検出され不可視ゆえ厄介→ (2) 食物連鎖を通じ人体に到達→ (3) 既存の汚染は除去できないが悪化は止められる、という構成。最終段の The realistic goal is not to undo the contamination but to stop making it worse がこれを集約しており、遍在・食物連鎖・除去不能だが抑制可能、を述べた選択肢が主旨。
「The floating islands of plastic debris are by far the most urgent environmental threat now facing the world's oceans.」
= 浮遊する漂着ゴミの島が最大の脅威 ━ 本文は浮遊ゴミの島を『目立つが、不可視の微粒子こそ厄介』と対比しており、島が最大の脅威とは言っていない。
「Microplastics have by now been proven to cause severe and immediate harm to the human body itself.」
= 人体に重大かつ即時の害が証明済み ━ 本文は『体内で何をするかは未解明 (an open question)』と明言しており、証明済みではない。
「Banning the microbeads used in cosmetics has by now already solved most of the microplastic problem.」
= 微小ビーズ禁止で問題の大半が解決済み ━ 本文は対策は『問題の一片 (a sliver) にすぎない』とし、大半が解決とは述べていない。
| パターン | 意味 | 例 |
|---|---|---|
| not so much A as B | AというよりむしろB | Plastic does not so much disappear as disperse. |
| fragment into ~ | ~に砕ける | fragment into particles |
| undo the contamination | 汚染を元に戻す | not to undo the contamination |
| make it worse | 事態を悪化させる | to stop making it worse |
| within reach | 手の届く範囲に | modest victories are still within reach |
Plastic does not so much disappear as disperse.
プラスチックは消えるというより拡散する。
The bottles fragment into tiny particles over time.
ボトルは時間をかけて微小な粒子に砕ける。
The realistic goal is to stop making it worse.
現実的な目標は悪化を止めることだ。
主旨設問は最終段の対比構文 (not A but B) に著者の結論が凝縮されやすい。極端肯定・極端否定の肢は本文の留保表現と矛盾しやすい。