EigoPro 準1級 読解 — Dark Tourism

Every year, millions of travellers deliberately seek out places defined by death and suffering: the gas chambers of Auschwitz, the killing fields of Cambodia, the irradiated streets of Chernobyl. The practice, which scholars label "dark tourism," is hardly new—Roman crowds flocked to the Colosseum, and Victorian sightseers paid to tour morgues—but its scale and visibility have grown enormously in the age of cheap flights and social media. What was once a quiet pilgrimage of remembrance has become, for some destinations, a mass-market attraction. Defenders of the practice argue that it serves an indispensable civic function. To stand where atrocities occurred, they contend, is to understand history in a way no textbook can rival; the visceral encounter with a site of horror cultivates empathy and, ideally, a resolve that "never again" should mean something. Memorial museums frequently depend on visitor revenue to fund their preservation and educational work, so the tourist's ticket is not merely voyeurism but a form of support. By this reasoning, remembering is a duty, and dark tourism is one of its modern instruments. Yet critics point to an uncomfortable gap between intention and behaviour. The same smartphones that might document an atrocity for posterity are too often used for grinning selfies; solemn ground is treated as a backdrop for personal branding. Commercial operators, eager to maximise footfall, may sand down the rough edges of a tragedy until it becomes palatable, even entertaining—a process that critics call the "Disneyfication" of suffering. When a site of genocide is packaged alongside a gift shop and a café, the line between honouring the dead and commodifying them grows perilously thin. The dilemma resists easy resolution, because the same visit can be both reverent and crass depending entirely on the visitor's frame of mind. Perhaps the most defensible position is neither blanket endorsement nor blanket condemnation, but a demand for context: that sites be governed by those who understand their meaning, and that visitors arrive prepared to be unsettled rather than merely entertained.

5問合格 60%以上普通

新規登録 または ログイン が必要です

この単元の問題を3問、解説つきで公開しています

準1級 · 読解 · 全5

1

What is the main idea of the passage?

  • Dark tourism is a recent invention made possible only by cheap flights and social media.
  • Travellers who visit sites of suffering are almost always motivated by genuine respect.
  • Visiting sites of tragedy can be valuable or exploitative, so it demands context and a respectful frame of mind.
  • Memorial museums should be closed to ordinary tourists to protect the dignity of the dead.
Phrase

neither blanket endorsement nor blanket condemnation, but a demand for context

準1級読解オピニオン主旨把握
ひとことで

悲劇の地への観光は価値にも搾取にもなりうるため、文脈と敬意ある態度が要る、が論旨。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

Visiting sites of tragedy can be valuable or exploitative, so it demands context and a respectful frame of mind.

正解

本文は (1) dark tourism の定義と拡大→ (2) 擁護論 (歴史教育・共感・保存資金)→ (3) 批判論 (自撮り・Disneyfication)→ (4) 結論 (全面肯定でも全面否定でもなく文脈の要求) という両論併記型。最終段の neither blanket endorsement nor blanket condemnation, but a demand for context が主旨を凝縮しており、「価値にも搾取にもなりうるので文脈と敬意ある心構えが要る」が正解。

  • Dark tourism is a recent invention

    = 近年生まれた新しい慣行 ━ 本文は hardly new と明言し、ローマのコロッセオやヴィクトリア朝の例を挙げているので逆。

  • Memorial museums ought to be closed to ordinary tourists so as to protect the dignity of the dead.

    = 一般観光客の立入を禁止すべき ━ 本文は来館者の収入が保存を支えるとも述べ、閉鎖は主張していない。

  • almost always motivated by genuine respect

    = ほぼ常に純粋な敬意が動機 ━ 本文は自撮りや個人ブランディングの問題を挙げており『ほぼ常に敬意』とは言えない。

Collocation
パターン意味
seek out ~~を探し求めるtravellers seek out sites of suffering
serve a ~ function~の機能を果たすIt serves a civic function.
blanket endorsement全面的な支持neither blanket endorsement nor condemnation
a demand for ~~の要求a demand for context
frame of mind心構え・心の状態the visitor's frame of mind
例文
  • Tourists deliberately seek out sites of past atrocities.

    観光客は過去の残虐行為の地を意図的に探し求める。

  • The practice is neither wholly good nor wholly bad.

    その慣行は全面的に善でも悪でもない。

  • Everything depends on the visitor's frame of mind.

    全ては訪問者の心構え次第だ。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

両論併記のオピニオン文では主旨は最終段に来る。neither A nor B, but C の C 部分が著者の着地点。

2

According to the passage, how do defenders justify dark tourism?

  • It generates enough profit to make memorial museums financially independent of governments.
  • It teaches history viscerally, builds empathy, and helps fund the preservation of memorial sites.
  • It guarantees that visitors will leave with a resolve to prevent future atrocities.
  • It is the only legal way for the public to learn about historical atrocities.
Phrase

the visceral encounter with a site of horror cultivates empathy ... Memorial museums frequently depend on visitor revenue

準1級読解オピニオン詳細把握
ひとことで

擁護論=教科書を超える体感的歴史教育+共感の育成+来館収入による保存支援。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

It teaches history viscerally, builds empathy, and helps fund the preservation of memorial sites.

正解

第2段で擁護論を3点で述べる。(a) no textbook can rival する体感的な歴史理解、(b) cultivates empathy、(c) museums depend on visitor revenue to fund their preservation。これを束ねた「体感的に歴史を教え、共感を育み、記念地の保存資金になる」が正解。

  • the only legal way

    = 公衆が学ぶ唯一の合法手段 ━ 本文は『教科書を超える』とは言うが『唯一の合法手段』とは言っていない (言い過ぎ)。

  • financially independent of governments

    = 政府から財政的に独立させる ━ 本文は visitor revenue が保存資金を『支える』とは言うが、政府からの独立までは述べていない。

  • guarantees that visitors will leave with a resolve

    = 決意を持って帰ることを保証する ━ 本文は ideally / should mean something と願望調で、保証はしていない。

Collocation
パターン意味
an indispensable function不可欠な機能It serves an indispensable function.
cultivate empathy共感を育むThe encounter cultivates empathy.
depend on ~ to fund ......の資金を~に頼るMuseums depend on revenue to fund preservation.
no textbook can rivalどんな教科書も及ばないin a way no textbook can rival
a form of support支援の一形態The ticket is a form of support.
例文
  • Standing on the site teaches history viscerally.

    現地に立つことは歴史を体感的に教える。

  • Visitor revenue helps fund the museum's preservation.

    来館収入は博物館の保存資金を支える。

  • The encounter is meant to cultivate empathy.

    その体験は共感を育むためのものだ。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

detail 設問の正解は本文の複数根拠をまとめた言い換え。「only」「guarantee」「independent」など本文にない強い限定語を含む肢は疑う。

3

What concern do critics raise about commercial operators?

  • They refuse to allow photography of any kind at sites of suffering.
  • They restrict access so severely that few visitors can attend.
  • They may soften a tragedy into something palatable in order to attract more visitors.
  • They donate all of their profits to the descendants of victims.
Phrase

Commercial operators, eager to maximise footfall, may sand down the rough edges of a tragedy until it becomes palatable

準1級読解オピニオン詳細把握
ひとことで

商業運営者は集客のため悲劇を口当たり良く均し『悲劇のディズニー化』を招く、と批判。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

They may soften a tragedy into something palatable in order to attract more visitors.

正解

第3段で批判の核心として、商業運営者が eager to maximise footfall (集客最大化を狙い) sand down the rough edges of a tragedy until it becomes palatable (悲劇の角を削り口当たり良くする)=Disneyfication と述べる。これを言い換えた「集客のため悲劇を口当たりの良いものに和らげる」が正解。

  • refuse to allow photography of any kind

    = 一切の撮影を拒否する ━ 撮影禁止の記述はない。問題はむしろ自撮りの濫用。

  • donate all of their profits to the descendants

    = 利益を全て遺族に寄付する ━ 本文にない美化された主張で、批判の文脈と矛盾。

  • restrict access so severely

    = 立入を極端に制限する ━ 本文は逆に footfall (来訪者数) の最大化を問題視している。

Collocation
パターン意味
maximise footfall来訪者数を最大化するoperators eager to maximise footfall
sand down the rough edges角を削って滑らかにするsand down the rough edges of a tragedy
until it becomes palatable口当たり良くなるまでsoftened until it becomes palatable
the line grows thin境界線が薄くなるthe line between honouring and commodifying grows thin
commodify ~~を商品化するcommodifying the dead
例文
  • Operators may soften a tragedy to attract crowds.

    運営者は集客のため悲劇を和らげるかもしれない。

  • The rough edges of the story were sanded down.

    その物語の角は削り落とされた。

  • A gift shop can commodify the memory of the dead.

    土産物店は死者の記憶を商品化しうる。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

detail 設問は段落を特定してから読む。比喩 (sand down / Disneyfication) は平易な動詞 (soften) に置換した肢が正解になりやすい。

残り2問は、解いて確かめられます

5問すべてに、この形式の解説が付いています。 間違えた問題は記録され、あとから復習できます。

無料で登録して続きを解く

インストール不要・カード登録なし・いま全機能無料