EigoPro 準1級読解 — Who Owns the Past?

Walk through the great encyclopaedic museums of London, Paris, or New York and you will encounter the spoils of empire: Egyptian sarcophagi, Benin bronzes, marble friezes prised from distant temples. For more than a century, the institutions that hold these objects defended their custody with a confident argument. A museum, they said, is a universal space where the achievements of all humanity can be studied side by side, accessible to scholars and the curious alike. Repatriation, on this view, would scatter a shared inheritance and impoverish everyone. That argument is now under sustained pressure. Source nations counter that many treasures were not acquired but looted—seized during colonial conquest or extracted under coercion—and that displaying them abroad perpetuates the very inequalities of power that produced the theft. To them, an object is not merely an artefact to be admired; it is a fragment of identity, severed from the community that gave it meaning. A bronze in a glass case in Europe, they argue, is mute; returned to its homeland, it speaks. Defenders of the museums have not surrendered, but their position has softened. Some warn, not unreasonably, that source institutions may lack the climate control or security to protect fragile pieces. Yet this caution increasingly rings hollow, for it presumes a permanent gap in capacity that the past two decades have steadily narrowed. A growing number of museums have begun to negotiate—lending objects, sharing ownership, or returning them outright—and the sky has not fallen. Visitors still come; scholarship continues. What the debate ultimately exposes is that there was never anything neutral about the museum. To gather the world under one roof was itself an exercise of power, and to dismantle that arrangement, piece by piece, is not a loss but an overdue reckoning. The question is no longer whether the past can be owned, but who gets to decide.

5問合格 60%以上普通

新規登録またはログインが必要です

この単元の問題を3問、解説つきで公開しています

準1級 · 読解 · 全5問

問 1

What is the main idea of the passage?

Encyclopaedic museums should be closed because they can no longer attract visitors.
The dispute over cultural treasures can never be resolved because both sides are equally right.
The long-standing case for keeping looted treasures in Western museums is collapsing, and returning them is an overdue correction.
Source nations lack the facilities to care for the treasures they are demanding back.

Phrase

to dismantle that arrangement, piece by piece, is not a loss but an overdue reckoning

準1級読解オピニオン論説主旨把握

⚡ひとことで

本文は「略奪文物を西洋館に留める論拠が崩れ、返還は遅れた是正だ」という論旨。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「The long-standing case for keeping looted treasures in Western museums is collapsing, and returning them is an overdue correction.」

正解

本文は (1) 博物館側の『普遍空間』論→ (2) 源郷諸国の反論 (略奪・アイデンティティの断片)→ (3) 博物館側の立場の軟化→ (4) 結論『博物館に中立はなく、解体は損失ではなく遅れた清算 (overdue reckoning)』という構成。よって『略奪文物を西洋館に留める長年の論拠が崩れ、返還は遅れた是正だ』が主旨。

「Encyclopaedic museums should be closed」
= 百科事典的博物館は閉鎖すべき ━ 本文は返還を論じるが館の閉鎖は主張していない。むしろ『来館者は依然来る』と存続を前提にしている。
「Source nations lack the facilities」
= 源郷諸国には設備がない ━ これは博物館側の主張として紹介され、本文は『その差は縮まった』と退けているので主旨ではない。
「The dispute over cultural treasures can never really be resolved, because both sides are equally right about it.」
= 両者は同等で永久に解決不能 ━ 著者は明確に返還側に傾いており『両者同等・解決不能』とはしていない。

▦Collocation

パターン	意味	例
the spoils of empire	帝国の戦利品	the spoils of empire fill the galleries
under sustained pressure	絶え間ない圧力にさらされて	The argument is under sustained pressure.
an overdue reckoning	遅れた清算	not a loss but an overdue reckoning
piece by piece	一片ずつ	dismantle the arrangement piece by piece
a shared inheritance	共有の遺産	scatter a shared inheritance

❝例文

The old defence is now under sustained pressure.
その旧来の弁護は今や絶え間ない圧力にさらされている。
Dismantling the system is not a loss but an overdue reckoning.
その体制の解体は損失ではなく遅れた清算だ。
The galleries are filled with the spoils of empire.
展示室は帝国の戦利品で埋まっている。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

主旨設問は最終段の評価文 (not a loss but an overdue reckoning) を探すと速い。逆接 (but) の後に著者の立場が来る型。

問 2

According to the passage, how have source nations characterized many of the contested objects?

As artefacts that hold little meaning for the communities they came from.
As pieces too fragile ever to be moved from their current locations.
As objects that were lawfully purchased from their original owners.
As items that were looted during colonial conquest or taken under coercion.

Phrase

many treasures were not acquired but looted—seized during colonial conquest or extracted under coercion

準1級読解オピニオン論説詳細把握

⚡ひとことで

源郷諸国は『多くの文物は購入ではなく略奪 (征服時の押収・強要による搾取)』と性格づける。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「As items that were looted during colonial conquest or taken under coercion.」

正解

第2段で源郷諸国は文物を not acquired but looted (取得ではなく略奪) と述べ、seized during colonial conquest (植民地征服中に押収)・extracted under coercion (強要のもと搾取) と説明する。これを言い換えた『植民地征服中に略奪された、または強要のもとで奪われた品』が正解。

「lawfully purchased」
= 合法的に購入された ━ 本文は not acquired but looted と明言しており、合法購入とは正反対。
「too fragile ever to be moved」
= 脆くて二度と移せない ━ 脆弱性は博物館側の主張であり、源郷諸国の文物の性格づけではない。
「hold little meaning for the communities」
= 源郷の共同体にほとんど意味がない ━ 本文は逆に『アイデンティティの断片 (a fragment of identity)』と述べている。

▦Collocation

パターン	意味	例
not A but B	AではなくB	not acquired but looted
seize during conquest	征服中に押収する	objects seized during conquest
extract under coercion	強要のもと搾取する	extracted under coercion
a fragment of identity	アイデンティティの断片	a fragment of identity
perpetuate inequalities	不平等を永続させる	displaying them perpetuates inequalities

❝例文

The objects were not acquired but looted.
その品々は取得されたのではなく略奪された。
Many were seized during colonial conquest.
その多くは植民地征服中に押収された。
To them, the bronze is a fragment of identity.
彼らにとってその青銅器はアイデンティティの断片だ。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

detail 設問は本文の語を別語に置換した選択肢が正解 (looted→looted, extracted under coercion→taken under coercion)。正反対の lawfully purchased は典型的な引っかけ。

問 3

What does the passage say has happened where museums have begun to negotiate returns?

Other museums have refused to follow their example in any way.
Attendance has collapsed and academic research has largely ceased.
Visitors have kept coming and scholarship has continued despite the returns.
Source institutions have proven unable to safeguard the returned objects.

Phrase

the sky has not fallen. Visitors still come; scholarship continues

準1級読解オピニオン論説詳細把握

⚡ひとことで

博物館が返還交渉を始めても『天は落ちず』来館者は来続け、研究も継続している。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「Visitors have kept coming and scholarship has continued despite the returns.」

正解

第3段で『貸与・共有・返還を交渉する博物館が増えても the sky has not fallen (大事には至らず)』とし、Visitors still come; scholarship continues と続ける。これを言い換えた『返還にもかかわらず来館者は来続け、研究も継続している』が正解。

「Attendance has collapsed and academic research has largely ceased.」
= 来館者は激減し研究も停止した ━ 本文は『来館者は依然来る・研究は続く』と述べており正反対。
「unable to safeguard the returned objects」
= 返還品を守れていない ━ 本文に返還品の損壊や保護失敗の記述はなく、むしろ能力差は縮まったとする。
「refused to follow their example」
= 他館は一切追随を拒否した ━ 本文は『交渉を始める博物館が増えている (A growing number)』と述べており逆。

▦Collocation

パターン	意味	例
the sky has not fallen	大事には至っていない	Returns happened, yet the sky has not fallen.
a growing number of ~	ますます多くの~	A growing number of museums negotiate.
return outright	完全に返還する	lending, sharing, or returning outright
share ownership	所有権を分け合う	museums sharing ownership of objects
ring hollow	空々しく響く	the caution rings hollow

❝例文

A growing number of museums now negotiate returns.
ますます多くの博物館が今や返還を交渉している。
They returned the pieces outright, and the sky has not fallen.
彼らは品を完全に返還したが、大事には至らなかった。
Visitors still come and scholarship continues.
来館者は依然来続け、研究も続いている。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

detail 設問では本文の比喩表現 (the sky has not fallen) が選択肢で平叙文に置き換わる。正反対肢 (attendance has collapsed) を即排除。

残り2問は、解いて確かめられます

全5問すべてに、この形式の解説が付いています。間違えた問題は記録され、あとから復習できます。

無料で登録して続きを解く

インストール不要・カード登録なし・いま全機能無料

この単元の講義を見る準1級の単元一覧準1級の用語集

EigoPro 準1級 読解 — Who Owns the Past?

この単元の問題を3問、解説つきで公開しています

to dismantle that arrangement, piece by piece, is not a loss but an overdue reckoning

many treasures were not acquired but looted—seized during colonial conquest or extracted under coercion

the sky has not fallen. Visitors still come; scholarship continues

EigoPro 準1級読解 — Who Owns the Past?