EigoPro 準1級 読解 — Farming Upward

As cities swell and arable land grows scarce, a once-fanciful idea has begun to take root in disused warehouses and purpose-built towers: farming upward rather than outward. Vertical farms stack crops in climate-controlled racks, feeding them with LED light tuned to the precise wavelengths plants crave and circulating nutrients through water rather than soil. Their proponents promise a tantalising prospect—lettuce and herbs grown a short truck ride from the supermarket, immune to drought, untouched by pesticides, and harvested all year round regardless of the weather outside. The advantages are genuine, but they come with an asterisk. Because everything is enclosed, a vertical farm can produce dramatically higher yields per square metre than a conventional field, and it consumes a fraction of the water, much of which is recycled. Yet the same enclosure that liberates the crop from the seasons makes it utterly dependent on electricity. Sunlight is free; the artificial glow that replaces it is not. In regions where power is generated by burning fossil fuels, the carbon footprint of a head of indoor lettuce can rival that of one flown in from another continent—hardly the green credential its champions advertise. Economics complicates the picture further. The crops that thrive indoors—leafy greens and herbs—are precisely those that are light, quick to mature, and command a premium. Staples such as wheat and rice, which feed most of humanity, remain stubbornly unsuited to the model; growing them in towers would be ruinously expensive. Critics therefore argue that vertical farming, for all its sleek promise, addresses a narrow slice of the food system while consuming capital and energy that might be deployed elsewhere. Its defenders counter that the technology is young, that LED efficiency keeps improving, and that renewable power could one day erase the carbon objection entirely. Whether the towers ultimately reshape how we eat, or remain a boutique solution for salad, may hinge less on horticulture than on the price of clean electricity.

5問合格 60%以上普通

新規登録 または ログイン が必要です

この単元の問題を3問、解説つきで公開しています

準1級 · 読解 · 全5

1

What is the main idea of the passage?

  • Vertical farming has already replaced conventional agriculture in most major cities.
  • Vertical farming offers real benefits but faces energy and economic limits that determine how far it can spread.
  • Vertical farming will soon allow staple crops like wheat and rice to be grown in towers cheaply.
  • Vertical farming is a fraud that produces no genuine advantages over field crops.
Phrase

vertical farming ... addresses a narrow slice of the food system while consuming capital and energy

準1級読解科学ジャーナリズム主旨把握
ひとことで

本文は「垂直農法は本物の利点を持つが、電力・経済の制約が普及の限界を決める」という論旨。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

Vertical farming offers real benefits but faces energy and economic limits that determine how far it can spread.

正解

本文は (1) 垂直農法の魅力的な利点 (高収量・節水・無農薬・通年収穫)→ (2) しかし enclosure ゆえ電力依存で carbon footprint が問題→ (3) 経済的にも葉物しか合わず staples は ruinously expensive、という構成。最終文は普及が『園芸より clean electricity の価格次第』と結ぶ。よって「利点はあるが電力・経済の制約が普及範囲を左右する」が主旨。

  • Vertical farming has already replaced conventional agriculture

    = 既に従来農業を置換した ━ 本文はむしろ a narrow slice of the food system しか扱えないと述べており、置換どころか限定的。

  • Vertical farming is a fraud that produces no genuine advantages

    = 利点皆無の詐欺 ━ 本文は The advantages are genuine と明記しており正反対。

  • Vertical farming will soon allow staple crops like wheat and rice to be grown in towers cheaply.

    = 主食を安価に栽培できる ━ 本文は wheat/rice は ruinously expensive で unsuited としており逆。

Collocation
パターン意味
take root根付く・定着するThe idea has begun to take root.
come with an asterisk但し書き付きであるThe advantages come with an asterisk.
a narrow slice of ~~のごく一部a narrow slice of the food system
hinge on ~~次第であるIts future may hinge on energy prices.
year round一年中harvested all year round
例文
  • The advantages are genuine, but they come with an asterisk.

    利点は本物だが、但し書き付きだ。

  • The idea has begun to take root in disused warehouses.

    そのアイデアは使われなくなった倉庫で根付き始めた。

  • Its success may hinge on the price of clean electricity.

    その成否はクリーン電力の価格次第かもしれない。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

主旨設問は最終段の結論文 (Whether ... may hinge on ...) を探すと速い。本文は『利点→but→制約』の譲歩構造で、結論は制約側に寄る。

2

According to the passage, why can indoor lettuce sometimes have a large carbon footprint?

  • It requires far more water than lettuce grown in an open field.
  • It must be sprayed with large quantities of pesticides to survive indoors.
  • It is typically flown in from another continent before being sold.
  • It depends entirely on electricity, which in some regions is generated by burning fossil fuels.
Phrase

makes it utterly dependent on electricity ... generated by burning fossil fuels

準1級読解科学ジャーナリズム詳細把握
ひとことで

屋内栽培は電力に完全依存し、その電力が化石燃料由来だと炭素排出が大きくなる。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

It depends entirely on electricity, which in some regions is generated by burning fossil fuels.

正解

第2段で enclosure が作物を季節から解放する代わりに utterly dependent on electricity にすると述べ、In regions where power is generated by burning fossil fuels では炭素排出量が空輸レタス並みになりうると説明する。よって『化石燃料発電の電力に全面依存するから』が正解。

  • must be sprayed with large quantities of pesticides

    = 大量の農薬散布が必要 ━ 本文は untouched by pesticides と無農薬を利点に挙げており逆。

  • flown in from another continent

    = 他大陸から空輸される ━ 空輸レタスは『比較対象』であって屋内レタス自体が空輸されるわけではない。

  • It requires far more water than lettuce grown in an open field.

    = 露地より多くの水が必要 ━ 本文は a fraction of the water で節水を利点としており逆。

Collocation
パターン意味
be dependent on ~~に依存しているutterly dependent on electricity
a fraction of ~~のごくわずかa fraction of the water
carbon footprint炭素排出量the carbon footprint of indoor lettuce
rival ~~に匹敵するcan rival that of imported produce
per square metre1平方メートルあたりhigher yields per square metre
例文
  • The crop is utterly dependent on artificial light.

    その作物は人工光に完全に依存している。

  • Indoor farming uses only a fraction of the water.

    屋内農法は水のごく一部しか使わない。

  • Its carbon footprint can rival that of imported food.

    その炭素排出量は輸入食品に匹敵しうる。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

detail 設問は本文の対比語に注意。『太陽光は無料 (free)・人工光は有料』の対比が答えの核。利点 (無農薬・節水) を否定する選択肢は引っかけ。

3

According to the passage, why are staple crops such as wheat and rice ill-suited to vertical farms?

  • They cannot germinate at all under artificial LED light.
  • Growing them indoors would be prohibitively expensive compared with the leafy greens that thrive there.
  • They mature too quickly to be harvested profitably in racks.
  • They are legally prohibited from being grown in urban towers.
Phrase

growing them in towers would be ruinously expensive

準1級読解科学ジャーナリズム詳細把握
ひとことで

主食 (小麦・米) は屋内栽培が破滅的に高コストなので垂直農法に不向き。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

Growing them indoors would be prohibitively expensive compared with the leafy greens that thrive there.

正解

第3段で屋内に向くのは light, quick to mature で premium の取れる葉物だと述べ、Staples such as wheat and rice ... remain stubbornly unsuited、growing them in towers would be ruinously expensive と続ける。よって『屋内では破滅的に高コストで葉物に比べ不向き』が正解。

  • cannot germinate at all under artificial LED light

    = LED光では全く発芽しない ━ 発芽不能とは述べておらず、問題はコスト。言い過ぎ。

  • mature too quickly to be harvested profitably

    = 成熟が速すぎて収穫できない ━ quick to mature は葉物の利点。主食は逆で、speed の問題ではない。

  • They are legally prohibited from being grown in any of the new urban farming towers at all.

    = 都市の塔での栽培が法的に禁止 ━ 法的禁止の記述はない。

Collocation
パターン意味
be unsuited to ~~に不向きであるunsuited to the model
ruinously expensive破滅的に高価なgrowing them would be ruinously expensive
command a premium高値が付くherbs command a premium
quick to mature成熟が速いcrops quick to mature
for all its ~~にもかかわらずfor all its sleek promise
例文
  • Wheat remains stubbornly unsuited to indoor farming.

    小麦は依然として屋内農法に不向きだ。

  • Growing rice in towers would be ruinously expensive.

    塔で米を育てるのは破滅的に高くつくだろう。

  • Herbs are light, quick to mature, and command a premium.

    ハーブは軽く、成熟が速く、高値が付く。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

detail 設問は『理由』を問うので、根拠語 (ruinously expensive) を別語 (prohibitively expensive) に置換した選択肢が正解。発芽不能・禁止など本文にない理由は除外。

残り2問は、解いて確かめられます

5問すべてに、この形式の解説が付いています。 間違えた問題は記録され、あとから復習できます。

無料で登録して続きを解く

インストール不要・カード登録なし・いま全機能無料