EigoPro 準1級 読解 — The Car-Free City

For nearly a century, urban planners treated the private automobile as the organising principle of city life. Roads were widened, suburbs sprawled outward, and the distance between home and work lengthened in lockstep with car ownership. Yet a growing chorus of planners now argues that this arrangement was never inevitable—and that cities built around the car have quietly impoverished the very public life they were meant to serve. Their proposed remedy is radical in its simplicity: reclaim urban space from the vehicle and return it to people on foot. The case rests on more than nostalgia. Proponents point out that a single car occupies roughly the road space of fifteen pedestrians, yet sits idle for the overwhelming majority of its existence. The land consumed by parking and multi-lane arterials, they note, could instead house parks, housing, and commerce. Cities such as Pontevedra in Spain, which banished cars from its medieval core two decades ago, report not the economic collapse merchants feared but a flourishing of street-level trade and a striking drop in traffic fatalities. The lesson, advocates contend, is that demand for driving is not fixed; reduce the convenience of the car, and people simply choose other ways to move. Critics are quick to temper this enthusiasm. A model that works in a compact European town, they caution, may falter in a sprawling metropolis where jobs and homes lie kilometres apart and public transit is threadbare. There is also the danger that pedestrianised districts become enclaves for the affluent, displacing the very residents who relied on cheap road access. These objections are not trivial, and the wisest reformers treat them as design constraints rather than refutations. What unites both camps, ultimately, is a recognition that the status quo is itself a choice—one made decades ago and renewed every time a city pours concrete for another lane. The car-free movement, whatever its limits, has performed a genuine service: it has forced cities to ask not merely how traffic should flow, but for whom the city exists.

5問合格 60%以上普通

新規登録 または ログイン が必要です

この単元の問題を3問、解説つきで公開しています

準1級 · 読解 · 全5問

問 1

What is the main idea of the passage?

  • The private car is the most efficient way to organise modern urban life.
  • Reformers argue that car-centred cities were a deliberate choice that should be reconsidered in favour of space for people.
  • Every city in the world should immediately ban all private automobiles.
  • Pedestrianised districts inevitably harm local merchants and the poor.
Phrase

cities built around the car have quietly impoverished the very public life they were meant to serve

準1級読解都市計画オピニオン主旨把握
⚡ひとことで

本文は「車中心の都市は意図的な選択であり、人のための空間へ見直すべき」という論旨。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「Reformers argue that car-centred cities were a deliberate choice that should be reconsidered in favour of space for people.」

正解

第1段で改革派が『車中心の配置は決して必然ではなかった』(this arrangement was never inevitable) と主張し、最終段で『現状そのものが数十年前になされた選択だ』(the status quo is itself a choice) と総括する。提案された解決策は reclaim urban space from the vehicle and return it to people on foot。したがって主旨は『車中心都市は意図的選択であり、人のための空間に見直すべき』。

  • 「Every single city in the world ought immediately to ban all of the private automobiles from its streets.」

    = 全都市で即時に車を全面禁止すべき ━ 本文は批判派の懸念を design constraints として尊重しており、即時全面禁止という極端な主張はしていない。

  • 「The private car is by far and away the most efficient way of organising the whole of modern urban life.」

    = 車が最も効率的という主張 ━ 本文はむしろ車中心配置が public life を impoverish したと述べており正反対。

  • 「Pedestrianised districts everywhere inevitably harm both the local merchants and the very poorest residents.」

    = 歩行者天国は必ず商人と貧困層を害する ━ Pontevedra では商業が flourish したと述べ、害は『危険性 (danger)』として注意されるに留まる。

▦Collocation
パターン意味例
organising principle組織原理the car as the organising principle of city life
a growing chorus of ~増えつつある~の声a growing chorus of planners
rest on more than ~~以上のものに基づくThe case rests on more than nostalgia.
the status quo現状the status quo is itself a choice
reclaim space from ~~から空間を取り戻すreclaim urban space from the vehicle
❝例文

  • This arrangement was never inevitable.

    この配置は決して必然ではなかった。

  • A growing chorus of planners now argues for change.

    増えつつある計画者の声が今や変革を訴えている。

  • The status quo is itself a choice made decades ago.

    現状そのものが数十年前になされた選択だ。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

主旨設問は第1段の問題提起と最終段の総括 (the status quo is itself a choice) を結ぶと速い。極端な全称肢 (Every / immediately ban all) は論説調の本文では誤答が多い。

問 2

According to the passage, what did Pontevedra experience after banning cars from its medieval core?

  • Street-level trade flourished and traffic deaths fell sharply, contrary to merchants' fears.
  • A rise in traffic fatalities offset by new commerce.
  • A complete return of cars within two decades of the ban.
  • The economic collapse that local merchants had predicted.
Phrase

report not the economic collapse merchants feared but a flourishing of street-level trade and a striking drop in traffic fatalities

準1級読解都市計画オピニオン詳細把握
⚡ひとことで

Pontevedra=商人が恐れた崩壊ではなく、街路商業の繁栄と交通死者の激減。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「Street-level trade flourished and traffic deaths fell sharply, contrary to merchants' fears.」

正解

第2段で Pontevedra は『商人が恐れた経済崩壊ではなく』(not the economic collapse merchants feared) 街路商業の flourishing と交通死者の striking drop を報告したと述べる。これを言い換えた『商人の恐れに反して街路商業が栄え、交通死者が激減した』が正解。

  • 「The complete economic collapse that every one of the local merchants had predicted.」

    = 商人が予測した経済崩壊 ━ 本文は not the economic collapse と明確に否定しているので逆。

  • 「A complete return of all the cars within just two decades of the original ban.」

    = 20年以内に車が完全復帰 ━ two decades ago に禁止し、その後 flourishing が続いたという話で、車の復帰の記述はない。

  • 「A sharp rise in the traffic fatalities that was then offset by the new commerce.」

    = 交通死者が増えたが商業で相殺 ━ 本文は a striking drop in traffic fatalities=死者の激減であり、増加は正反対。

▦Collocation
パターン意味例
banish cars from ~~から車を追放するbanished cars from its medieval core
a flourishing of ~~の繁栄a flourishing of street-level trade
a striking drop in ~~の著しい減少a striking drop in traffic fatalities
contrary to one's fears恐れに反してcontrary to merchants' fears
two decades ago20年前にbanished cars two decades ago
❝例文

  • The town banished cars from its core two decades ago.

    その町は20年前に中心部から車を追放した。

  • Trade flourished contrary to merchants' fears.

    商人の恐れに反して商業は栄えた。

  • There was a striking drop in traffic fatalities.

    交通死者の著しい減少があった。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

「not A but B」構文の detail 設問は B 側が正解になる。A (collapse) を答えに据えた肢は典型的な引っかけ。

問 3

What concern do critics raise about car-free policies?

  • Such policies may fail in sprawling cities with weak transit and may turn districts into enclaves for the wealthy.
  • They insist that compact European towns can never go car-free.
  • They claim cars occupy less space than pedestrians in large cities.
  • They argue the policies are physically impossible to implement anywhere.
Phrase

may falter in a sprawling metropolis where jobs and homes lie kilometres apart and public transit is threadbare

準1級読解都市計画オピニオン詳細把握
⚡ひとことで

批判派の懸念=広大な都市で公共交通が貧弱だと失敗し、地区が富裕層の飛び地になる。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

「Such policies may fail in sprawling cities with weak transit and may turn districts into enclaves for the wealthy.」

正解

第3段で批判派は『広大な大都市では公共交通が threadbare で失敗しうる』(may falter ... public transit is threadbare) と警告し、さらに『歩行者地区が affluent の enclave になり、住民を displace する危険』を挙げる。これを言い換えた『公共交通の弱い広大都市で失敗し、富裕層の飛び地になりうる』が正解。

  • 「physically impossible to implement anywhere」

    = どこでも物理的に実施不可能 ━ 本文は『失敗しうる (may falter)』であって『不可能』とは言っていない。言い過ぎ。

  • 「They claim that cars occupy a great deal less of the space than pedestrians do within large cities.」

    = 車は歩行者より省スペース ━ 第2段で1台の車は歩行者15人分の道路を占めるとあり正反対。

  • 「They insist that even the most compact of the European towns can never possibly go car-free at all.」

    = コンパクトな欧州の町は車なしにできない ━ Pontevedra の成功例があり、批判はむしろ大都市への適用を懸念している。

▦Collocation
パターン意味例
temper one's enthusiasm熱意を抑えるCritics temper this enthusiasm.
falter in ~~でつまずくmay falter in a sprawling metropolis
lie kilometres apart数キロ離れているjobs and homes lie kilometres apart
an enclave for ~~の飛び地an enclave for the affluent
treat A as B rather than CAをCではなくBと見なすtreat them as design constraints rather than refutations
❝例文

  • Critics are quick to temper this enthusiasm.

    批判派はすぐにこの熱意を抑えにかかる。

  • The model may falter in a sprawling metropolis.

    そのモデルは広大な大都市では失敗しうる。

  • The wisest reformers treat objections as design constraints.

    最も賢明な改革者は反論を設計上の制約と捉える。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

別段落の detail 設問は『誰の主張か』を取り違えないこと。critics の段落 (第3段) と advocates の段落 (第2段) を混ぜた肢は誤答になりやすい。

残り2問は、解いて確かめられます

全5問すべてに、この形式の解説が付いています。 間違えた問題は記録され、あとから復習できます。

無料で登録して続きを解く

インストール不要・カード登録なし・いま全機能無料

この単元の講義を見る準1級の単元一覧準1級の用語集