EigoPro 準1級 読解 — Harnessing the Sun

A decade ago, electricity from solar panels was an indulgence affordable only to the environmentally minded wealthy or to governments willing to subsidise it heavily. Today, in most of the world, it is the cheapest source of new power humanity has ever built. The cost of photovoltaic modules has fallen by roughly ninety per cent since 2010, a collapse so steep that energy forecasters who once dismissed solar as a marginal curiosity have been forced into a series of embarrassing upward revisions. What changed was not a single breakthrough but the relentless logic of manufacturing scale: each doubling of cumulative production shaved a predictable slice off the price, until the technology quietly crossed the threshold of being cheaper than coal. Yet cheap generation is only half the story, and arguably the easier half. The sun, inconveniently, does not shine at night or on demand, and a grid built around fossil fuels assumes that supply can be dialled up to match consumption at any moment. Solar inverts this assumption, flooding the system with power at midday and abandoning it at dusk. Without somewhere to store the surplus, utilities are sometimes forced to pay customers to consume electricity, or simply to switch the panels off—a phenomenon known as curtailment that quietly wastes a growing share of what is generated. This is why the energy transition increasingly hinges less on panels than on batteries and the unglamorous business of rewiring the grid. Critics seize on intermittency to argue that solar can never anchor a modern economy, but the objection mistakes a present limitation for a permanent one. Storage costs are now falling along a trajectory uncannily similar to the one panels traced a decade ago. The transition will not be frictionless, and incumbents with stranded coal assets have every incentive to exaggerate its difficulties. But the direction of travel is no longer seriously in doubt; only its pace remains to be negotiated.

5問合格 60%以上普通

新規登録 または ログイン が必要です

この単元の問題を3問、解説つきで公開しています

準1級 · 読解 · 全5

1

What is the main idea of the passage?

  • Solar power has become remarkably cheap, and the remaining obstacles to its dominance are about storage and grids rather than generation.
  • The intermittency of sunlight makes solar power fundamentally unsuitable for a modern economy.
  • A single technological breakthrough caused the dramatic fall in the price of solar panels.
  • Solar power remains too expensive to compete with coal except where governments subsidise it.
Phrase

the energy transition increasingly hinges less on panels than on batteries and the unglamorous business of rewiring the grid

準1級読解技術エネルギー論説主旨把握
ひとことで

太陽光は劇的に安くなり、残る課題は発電ではなく蓄電と送電網にある、が論旨。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

Solar power has become remarkably cheap, and the remaining obstacles to its dominance are about storage and grids rather than generation.

正解

本文は (1) 太陽光が史上最安の新電源になった→ (2) しかし安い発電は『半分』にすぎず断続性が問題→ (3) ゆえに鍵はパネルより蓄電池と送電網の再配線にある、という構成。第3段冒頭 hinges less on panels than on batteries ... rewiring the grid が主旨を凝縮しており、「太陽光は著しく安くなり、残る障害は発電ではなく蓄電と送電網だ」が正解。

  • Solar power remains too expensive to compete with coal except where governments subsidise it.

    = 補助金がなければ依然高すぎる ━ 10年前の状況であって、本文は『今やcoalより安い』と明言しており現状と正反対。

  • The intermittency of sunlight makes solar power fundamentally unsuitable for any large modern industrial economy at all.

    = 断続性ゆえ本質的に不向き ━ これは批判者の主張で、著者は『現在の限界を恒久的限界と取り違えている』と退けている。

  • A single technological breakthrough

    = 単一のブレークスルーが原因 ━ 本文は not a single breakthrough but the relentless logic of manufacturing scale と明確に否定している。

Collocation
パターン意味
hinge on ~~次第であるThe transition hinges on batteries.
the cheapest source of ~最も安い~源the cheapest source of new power
rewire the grid送電網を配線し直すthe business of rewiring the grid
only half the story話の半分にすぎないCheap power is only half the story.
the direction of travel進む方向・趨勢the direction of travel is clear
例文
  • Solar is now the cheapest source of new power.

    太陽光は今や最も安い新電源だ。

  • The transition hinges on storage, not panels.

    移行は蓄電次第で、パネル次第ではない。

  • Cheap generation is only half the story.

    安い発電は話の半分にすぎない。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

主旨設問は『but / yet / this is why』直後の文を探す。本文は各段の逆接で論点を発電→蓄電へ移しており、最終段冒頭が全体の主張。

2

According to the passage, what mainly drove the fall in the cost of photovoltaic modules?

  • A sudden scientific discovery that transformed how panels are made.
  • The steadily compounding effect of manufacturing at ever-greater scale.
  • The accurate forecasts of energy analysts who predicted the collapse early.
  • Generous government subsidies aimed at wealthy environmentalists.
Phrase: not a single breakthrough but the relentless logic of manufacturing scale

each doubling of cumulative production shaved a predictable slice off the price

準1級読解技術エネルギー論説詳細把握
ひとことで

価格低下の原因は単発の発明ではなく、生産規模拡大の累積効果(学習曲線)。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

The steadily compounding effect of manufacturing at ever-greater scale.

正解

第1段末で What changed was not a single breakthrough but the relentless logic of manufacturing scale と述べ、each doubling of cumulative production shaved a predictable slice off the price と具体化する。これは累積生産が倍増するごとに価格が下がる『学習曲線』効果であり、「規模拡大の着実に累積する効果」が正解。

  • A sudden scientific discovery

    = 突然の科学的発見 ━ 本文は not a single breakthrough と明言、発見ではなく製造規模が原因。

  • Generous government subsidies

    = 手厚い補助金 ━ 補助金は10年前に裕福層が買えた背景として触れるだけで、価格暴落の原因として挙げていない。

  • accurate forecasts of energy analysts

    = アナリストの正確な予測 ━ むしろ予測者は外し『恥ずかしい上方修正』を繰り返した、と逆に描かれる。

Collocation
パターン意味
manufacturing scale製造規模the logic of manufacturing scale
cumulative production累積生産量each doubling of cumulative production
shave a slice off ~~から一部を削るshaved a slice off the price
cross the threshold of ~~の境を越えるcrossed the threshold of being cheaper
upward revision上方修正embarrassing upward revisions
例文
  • Scale, not invention, drove the price down.

    価格を下げたのは発明ではなく規模だ。

  • Each doubling of output shaved a slice off the cost.

    生産が倍増するごとにコストが削られた。

  • Forecasters were forced into upward revisions.

    予測者は上方修正を迫られた。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

detail設問は本文の対比『not A but B』を見抜く。誤答はしばしば否定された A 側(breakthrough)を正解に偽装する。

3

What problem does the passage describe as "curtailment"?

  • Coal plants are shut down faster than solar can replace them.
  • Generated solar electricity is wasted because there is no way to store the midday surplus.
  • Utilities deliberately limit how many solar panels customers may install.
  • Panels gradually lose efficiency and produce less power each year.
Phrase

switch the panels off—a phenomenon known as curtailment that quietly wastes a growing share of what is generated

準1級読解技術エネルギー論説詳細把握
ひとことで

curtailment=正午の余剰を蓄える手段がなく発電した電力を捨てる現象。

選択肢の解説Choice Analysis

Generated solar electricity is wasted because there is no way to store the midday surplus.

正解

第2段で太陽光が正午に電力を溢れさせ夕方に放棄すると述べ、Without somewhere to store the surplus と続き、パネルを切る curtailment が wastes a growing share of what is generated と定義される。よって「正午の余剰を蓄える手段がないため発電した電力が無駄になること」が正解。

  • Panels gradually lose efficiency

    = パネルが徐々に劣化する ━ 経年劣化の話ではない。curtailmentは余剰を捨てる運用上の現象。

  • Utilities deliberately limit how many solar panels their customers are allowed to install.

    = 設置数を制限する ━ 設置制限の記述はない。問題は発電後の余剰処理。

  • Coal plants are shut down faster than solar can replace

    = 石炭の閉鎖が太陽光より速い ━ 本文にない別問題で、curtailmentの定義と無関係。

Collocation
パターン意味
store the surplus余剰を蓄えるsomewhere to store the surplus
flood the system with ~~でシステムを溢れさせるflooding the system with power
a growing share of ~~の増大する割合a growing share of what is generated
switch ~ off~を切るswitch the panels off
on demand必要に応じてthe sun does not shine on demand
例文
  • Without storage, the midday surplus is wasted.

    蓄電がなければ正午の余剰は無駄になる。

  • Solar floods the grid at midday and abandons it at dusk.

    太陽光は正午に網を溢れさせ夕暮れに見放す。

  • Curtailment wastes a growing share of output.

    出力抑制は発電量の増大する割合を無駄にする。

💡Tip · 覚えるコツ

専門語の定義設問は、ダッシュやknown asの直後にある言い換え句を探す。本文は switch off — a phenomenon known as curtailment that ... と直後に定義を置く。

残り2問は、解いて確かめられます

5問すべてに、この形式の解説が付いています。 間違えた問題は記録され、あとから復習できます。

無料で登録して続きを解く

インストール不要・カード登録なし・いま全機能無料