問 1
What is the main idea of the passage?
- Noise pollution is merely an annoyance with no ecological consequences.
- Sound is an overlooked but powerful signal of biodiversity, and noise is a hidden form of habitat damage.
- Conservation should abandon the study of sight entirely.
- Photographs remain the only reliable way to measure biodiversity.
Noise ... is not a mere nuisance but a form of habitat degradation
本文の論旨は『音は見過ごされた強力な生物多様性の指標であり、騒音は見えない生息地破壊だ』。
「Sound is an overlooked but powerful signal of biodiversity, and noise is a hidden form of habitat damage.」
正解第1段で sound を neglecting an equally telling signal と位置づけ、第2段で Noise ... is not a mere nuisance but a form of habitat degradation, one that leaves no visible scar と述べる。よって『音は見過ごされた生物多様性の指標で、騒音は見えない生息地破壊』が主旨。
「Photographs still remain the only reliable way of measuring the biodiversity of any habitat.」
= 写真だけが信頼できる唯一の方法 ━ no photograph can convey と音の優位を述べ逆。
「Noise pollution is merely a human annoyance and carries no ecological consequences at all.」
= 騒音は生態系に無影響の迷惑事 ━ not a mere nuisance but ... degradation と明確に否定。
「Conservation science ought to abandon the study of sight and vision entirely from now on.」
= 視覚研究を完全に放棄せよ ━ 視覚を補う第二の信号を説くだけで、放棄は言い過ぎ。
| パターン | 意味 | 例 |
|---|---|---|
| follow suit | 右へ倣う | Conservation followed suit. |
| a telling signal | 雄弁な信号 | an equally telling signal |
| not a mere nuisance but ~ | 単なる迷惑でなく~ | not a mere nuisance but degradation |
| habitat degradation | 生息地の劣化 | a form of habitat degradation |
| leave no visible scar | 目に見える傷を残さない | It leaves no visible scar. |
Sound is a telling signal of biodiversity.
音は生物多様性を雄弁に語る信号だ。
Noise is a form of habitat degradation.
騒音は生息地劣化の一形態だ。
It leaves no visible scar, so we overlook it.
目に見える傷を残さぬので見過ごされる。
主旨は『見過ごされた指標 (sound) + 見えない害 (noise)』の二点を含む肢を採る。not a mere nuisance but ~ の対比構文が主張の核。極端な全否定肢 (写真だけ/視覚放棄) は外す。